6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted October 28, 2015 Posted October 28, 2015 I tested best speed achivable for short amounts of time by closing radiators flying over rivers at about 150m. I normally took the aircraft to about 95% Topspeed on Autolevel and open rads, then went manual and closed radiators to Topspeed. Bf109G-2: (Calibrates to 20° according to testing should do 535) Autumn: 532 Summer 522 Winter: 562 Bf109F-4: (Calibrated Test results for 20° are 535 too at Combat Power) Autumn: 532/556 Summer: 522/548 Winter: 562/590 Fw190 A-3 Autumn: 525/552 Summer: 515/545 Winter: 556/587 LaGG-3 20mm Autumn: 513 Summer: 503 Winter: 543 La-5 Autumn: 547 Summer: 537 Winter: 578 Yak-1 (Overheats for 20 Seconds, continues without alerts, very wird behaviour indeed, engine damage after 5 minutes) Autumn: 529 (tried 50% radiators, 516) Summer: 518 Winter: 560 Can someone give me the Performance charts for the Yak-1? It does seem a good deal optimistic considering that the calibrated to 20° the Yak-1 would be in the region of 530kph, same as the 109 G-2. 2
6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted October 28, 2015 Author Posted October 28, 2015 Well, I was bored, curious and the MP Servers are overloaded and running as smoothly as right angles.
Matt Posted October 28, 2015 Posted October 28, 2015 Just FYI, temperature on the summer map is 25 °C and on the autumn map it's 15 °C.
6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted October 28, 2015 Author Posted October 28, 2015 Just FYI, temperature on the summer map is 25 °C and on the autumn map it's 15 °C. Well, the 109s should be faster then. 535 is the German result.
Matt Posted October 28, 2015 Posted October 28, 2015 Well, it does 532 km/h in your test and did you trim the stabilizer fully nose-down (which you have to do to get maximum speed)?
6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted October 28, 2015 Author Posted October 28, 2015 Well, it does 532 km/h in your test and did you trim the stabilizer fully nose-down (which you have to do to get maximum speed)? Thnx M8, gave me up to 538. Fact remains that the Yak is still very fast.
Wulf Posted October 29, 2015 Posted October 29, 2015 Thnx M8, gave me up to 538. Fact remains that the Yak is still very fast. If Yak is doing about 518/519 km/h down near the deck that should be about spot on.
6./ZG26_5tuka Posted October 29, 2015 Posted October 29, 2015 With fully open radiators the Yak can do 490 km/h at full fuel on that altitude (in summer). It also didn't show overheating tendencies at this speed even though water temperature settled around 100°. Bf 109 F-4 definetly sees overperforming with 548 km/h in summer as measrued by your test. G-2 should be a tad faster (as you wrote it should do 530km/h). La-5 was tested with fortza I assume? Yak-1 (Overheats for 20 Seconds, continues without alerts, very wird behaviour indeed, engine damage after 5 minutes) Autumn: 529 (tried 50% radiators, 516) Summer: 518 Winter: 560 Can someone give me the Performance charts for the Yak-1? It does seem a good deal optimistic considering that the calibrated to 20° the Yak-1 would be in the region of 530kph, same as the 109 G-2. Just for clearance, to what season are you referring to?
Finkeren Posted October 29, 2015 Posted October 29, 2015 I have no charts, but why does this seem wrong to you? A late model Yak-1 with an engine optimised for low level operation is slightly slower than the 109 and noticeably slower than a Fw 190 on the deck. That seems to jive pretty well with everything I've read about the Yak.
JtD Posted October 29, 2015 Posted October 29, 2015 Thanks for testing and sharing. Standard conditions at sea level are 15°C btw, so the autumn map figures might be the ones most comparable to real life figures. 2
6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted October 29, 2015 Author Posted October 29, 2015 With fully open radiators the Yak can do 490 km/h at full fuel on that altitude (in summer). It also didn't show overheating tendencies at this speed even though water temperature settled around 100°. Bf 109 F-4 definetly sees overperforming with 548 km/h in summer as measrued by your test. G-2 should be a tad faster (as you wrote it should do 530km/h). La-5 was tested with fortza I assume? Just for clearance, to what season are you referring to? Yes, Forsazh. The F-4 was nnever tested at full power, but 15kph+ to combat power seems realistic.
Dakpilot Posted October 29, 2015 Posted October 29, 2015 http://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/18900-speed-kills/?p=297597 Some similar speed tests in this thread, slightly different conclusions Cheers Dakpilot
LittleJP Posted October 29, 2015 Posted October 29, 2015 Fw 190 seems to be underperforming severely.
Fern Posted October 29, 2015 Posted October 29, 2015 So by the speeds presented, the Russians perform the same speed regardless the radiator settings? While there's a difference in German speeds?
6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted October 29, 2015 Author Posted October 29, 2015 So by the speeds presented, the Russians perform the same speed regardless the radiator settings? While there's a difference in German speeds? Actually it's a 30-40kph difference
III/JG2Gustav05 Posted October 31, 2015 Posted October 31, 2015 (edited) One intersting thing, La5 in summer map, 12:00PM, 0 wind, at 500m air inlet =100% air outlet=0%, oil rad=0%, wep on, 100% prop pitch, throttle 100% get overheat message and oil temp reach 123C, cylinder temp 230C, keeps 535km/h speed untill Wep time limit reaches no engine damage!!!!! L5 got an over-heat damage free engine !!!! Edited October 31, 2015 by III/JG2Gustav05
SR-F_Winger Posted October 31, 2015 Posted October 31, 2015 One intersting thing, La5 in summer map, 12:00PM, 0 wind, at 500m air inlet =100% air outlet=0%, oil rad=0%, wep on, 100% prop pitch, throttle 100% get overheat message and oil temp reach 123C, cylinder temp 230C, keeps 535km/h speed untill Wep time limit reaches no engine damage!!!!! L5 got an over-heat damage free engine !!!! You should file a bugreport in the apropriate section! Thanks for finding out!
Matt Posted November 1, 2015 Posted November 1, 2015 Maybe he should redo the test a couple of times instead.
6./ZG26_5tuka Posted November 1, 2015 Posted November 1, 2015 (edited) Maybe its an issue with quick missions. I broke my engine in a matter of seconds after closing my rads in a dive and mistakenly leaving them closed in the climbout in MP. Edited November 1, 2015 by Stab/JG26_5tuka
III/JG2Gustav05 Posted November 2, 2015 Posted November 2, 2015 (edited) Maybe he should redo the test a couple of times instead. I tried Several times in Quick mission, you can check it by yourself if you want. by the way the top speed seems just drops from 536 to 535 after overheat several mins. I doubt if this is so-called engine damage, Edited November 2, 2015 by III/JG2Gustav05
Matt Posted November 2, 2015 Posted November 2, 2015 I tested it yesterday and fly the La-5 regularly (it's the soviet plane I fly the most). I'm getting catastrophic engine damage (= engine stopped) a few minutes before the time limit of the boost usage is expired (not that those are related, temperature is causing the damage), even with fully open oil cooler.
Y29.Layin_Scunion Posted November 8, 2015 Posted November 8, 2015 I just tested the La-5 and killed the engine from overheating without boost. I simply closed inlet/outlet cowls and went full bore. Engine overheat and damage in reasonable time.Looks like another witch hunt to me.....
III/JG2Gustav05 Posted November 8, 2015 Posted November 8, 2015 For sure you will damage it if you close the air inlet and let the engine temp increase to 300C. according to the manual the oil temp should not higher than 115C, in my case I got 123C and engine overheat message keeps showing up for 10 mins but nothing happens on engine.
6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted November 8, 2015 Author Posted November 8, 2015 Hey everyone, I just made a turn time test (cuz bored).
Matt Posted November 9, 2015 Posted November 9, 2015 Just because no "engine damage" message shows up doesn't mean that the engine didn't get damaged. First indicator is a jumping needle on the tachometer. When you see that, you'll get "engine damage" message some time afterwards, but effectively your engine is already damaged. Also as for the speed test, some planes side slip considerably if you keep the auto level on. The plane that shows this the most, is the Fw 190. So you can't use auto level to test the maximum speed.
JtD Posted November 10, 2015 Posted November 10, 2015 Matt, have you tested the significance of side slip - do you know if this accounts for say 3 km/h or 30?
6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted November 10, 2015 Author Posted November 10, 2015 Matt, have you tested the significance of side slip - do you know if this accounts for say 3 km/h or 30? Barely any.
6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann Posted November 16, 2015 Author Posted November 16, 2015 Can someone point me to the 515-530 kph at SL for the Yak-1?
III/JG2Gustav05 Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 (edited) Just because no "engine damage" message shows up doesn't mean that the engine didn't get damaged. First indicator is a jumping needle on the tachometer. When you see that, you'll get "engine damage" message some time afterwards, but effectively your engine is already damaged. Also as for the speed test, some planes side slip considerably if you keep the auto level on. The plane that shows this the most, is the Fw 190. So you can't use auto level to test the maximum speed. I dont care if the "engine damage" message shows up!! what I observed is the engine temp is higher than the max temp presented in the manual and it still can run at this temp with no speed loss till my test is end (10mins), how you can tell me the engine is already damaged if there is no speed loss of the AC? Edited December 17, 2015 by III/JG2Gustav05
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now