Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
II./JG27_Rich

Fw-190D Diving with Allied bombs

Recommended Posts

Where was this sourced from?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not actually diving with the bombs by the look of it, seems like it's simply passing under a bomber.

 

 

That is what it looks like to me too, still, what a photo, amazing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where was this sourced from?

?

 

+1 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just looks shoped to me,

 

either blurry plane was added or clear cut bombs where added(probably plane). they dont fit on same image.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an image that's been around on the web a long time, and you can see the original military reference number at the upper-right hand edge of the shot.

Edited by LukeFF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just looks shoped to me,

 

either blurry plane was added or clear cut bombs where added(probably plane). they dont fit on same image.

Or plane is just moving so fast that long shut down time of the lense (dont know proper word, not photographer) makes is blurry while bombs move relatevily slowly and drop away from camera not past it.

 

People are silly...

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sure all possible, but question is what is likely? its more likely that it is shopped then not, changing photographs is a long tradition since we have photos, exactly to produce iconic images you would not be able to photograph likely.

its also possible that the UFO´s on ufo images are real, however the photo that is supposed to show them is likely not. 

 

 

the orig number on image may well be original, its showed the bombs thats it, and just cause its around a long time, we shopped pictures pre 1900´s, so i doubt its longer around then us manipulating pictures.

 

people are easy fooled... ;)


in case someone is interested, photo shopping in USSR;

 

http://englishrussia.com/2012/09/06/photo-manipulations-in-the-ussr/

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's not shopped, it's simply an unintentional photo of a 190, the bomber crew is obviously taking images of the bomb fall maybe to track to target and an 190 has simply flow into frame at high speed under the bomber, it's so obvious.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's not shopped, it's simply an unintentional photo of a 190, the bomber crew is obviously taking images of the bomb fall maybe to track to target and an 190 has simply flow into frame at high speed under the bomber, it's so obvious.

So the Luftwaffe invented the photobomb...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it's not shopped, it's simply an unintentional photo of a 190, the bomber crew is obviously taking images of the bomb fall maybe to track to target and an 190 has simply flow into frame at high speed under the bomber, it's so obvious.

 

Exactly, and it's no more of a Photoshop job than this one: 

 

Me_410_Hornisse_with_BK_5.jpg

Edited by LukeFF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ouchh! That's a close call!

 

I can imagine the german pilot freezed holding breath while instinctively stepping on the brakes at the sight of the bombs.

 

Depending on your POV explosives could have passed the meeting point before him though.  ;)

 

AA_Engadin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That photo of the Dora had been around for years. it is one of my books from at least 30 years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That photo of the Dora had been around for years. it is one of my books from at least 30 years ago.

That will silence the photoshop doubters :biggrin:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

id say the 190 is unfocused cause the camera focus is set at infinite and the bombs are much far away than the 190

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

guys you are a funny lot, you act like i want to take away your little baby jesus, no worry you can keep him, i basically said only, looks shopped "TO ME", i never ruled out that the picture may be 100% legit ;)

and no, other, different photos do not legitimize a shopped photo, not sure what you where thinking there.

also if its in a book 40 years old....what does this say? nothing! books as newspapers are full with manipulated images throughout history.

 

anyways, you guys like to believe so badly that you start mocking me or referring to me personally in a 3rd person type in a mocking way. also you make up reasons to reassure yourself how legit that picture is, not sure if you doubt it more than i do.

 

whatever, i am not attacking your baby jesus anymore, leave me in peace, have fun with the pic, i am out of this thread. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That will silence the photoshop doubters :biggrin:

Nothing will silence photoshop doubters :biggrin: . (And yes, a heck of image. Thanks for sharing it).

 

photoshops.png

 

http://xkcd.com/331/

Edited by Trupobaw
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

guys you are a funny lot, you act like i want to take away your little baby jesus, no worry you can keep him, i basically said only, looks shopped "TO ME", i never ruled out that the picture may be 100% legit ;)

and no, other, different photos do not legitimize a shopped photo, not sure what you where thinking there.

also if its in a book 40 years old....what does this say? nothing! books as newspapers are full with manipulated images throughout history.

 

anyways, you guys like to believe so badly that you start mocking me or referring to me personally in a 3rd person type in a mocking way. also you make up reasons to reassure yourself how legit that picture is, not sure if you doubt it more than i do.

 

whatever, i am not attacking your baby jesus anymore, leave me in peace, have fun with the pic, i am out of this thread. 

 

Well, you're the funny one here calling photoshop for no real reason on a VERY CLASSIC PHOTO seen in VERY OLD BOOKS and then looking down upon anyone telling you it's not the case. That photo was an accidental shot of a 190D from an allied bomber, I've seen it several time in several books that came out before photoshop even existed.

 

Keep baby Jesus out of this, this has nothing to do with religion or zealots.

 

Seriously what a bad attitude. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny how the doubter wants others to prove it's legit. I'd think the weight of proving it fakes falls squarely on the doubter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why would anyone need to fake a photo that depicts a probably common event during that period? it's not a 190 diving with bombs, it doesn't even look like it's diving, it's just a 190 passing under an allied bomber with some bombs falling below it, the whole concept would be like photo shopping Hitlers moustache on Hitler.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny how the doubter wants others to prove it's legit. I'd think the weight of proving it fakes falls squarely on the doubter.

 

This is not the only subject where this happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

guys you are a funny lot, you act like i want to take away your little baby jesus, no worry you can keep him, i basically said only, looks shopped "TO ME", i never ruled out that the picture may be 100% legit ;)

and no, other, different photos do not legitimize a shopped photo, not sure what you where thinking there.

also if its in a book 40 years old....what does this say? nothing! books as newspapers are full with manipulated images throughout history.

 

anyways, you guys like to believe so badly that you start mocking me or referring to me personally in a 3rd person type in a mocking way. also you make up reasons to reassure yourself how legit that picture is, not sure if you doubt it more than i do.

 

whatever, i am not attacking your baby jesus anymore, leave me in peace, have fun with the pic, i am out of this thread. 

 

Lets just keep baby Jesus out of the discussion shall we.. :mellow:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets just keep baby Jesus out of the discussion shall we.. :mellow:

Damn, I was just about to make a massive post about how I played baby Jesus when I was a few months old :(

 

 

:P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...