Jump to content


Photo

Idea? Fi-156 Storch and Po-2!


  • Please log in to reply
145 replies to this topic

#121 6./ZG26_Klaus-Mann

6./ZG26_Klaus-Mann
  • Tester
  • Posts: 2205
  • Location:Aachen, Germany

Posted 09 January 2017 - 11:53

Despite I would love to have them,  I find the Po2 VERY slow. Would be valid, solid gameplay for solo playing, but for multiplayer, more difficult.   The cruise speed of a po2 is 110 km/h   Try to fly that speed: take our beloved Tante Ju with full flaps, and manage to fly at 110km/h (almost stall speed) and fly with it... takes a LOT of time actually to even do a "tiny" 50 km. (typical low objective distance in MP)  

 

The Ju-52 is listed at 210kph,, yet ingame it is mostly flown around 230-240kph.

The Po-2 is listed at 110 Cruise and 155 Maximum, so my guess is that ingame it will be flown much faster than Civilians would have, so my guess realistically it's more like 130-140.

 

That's 50km in around 20 Minutes. Since you wouldn't cross the Front by much, you wouldn't have to fly far anyways. Most of the time it would be flown in your own territory, just like a 52.

 

The main challenges it would be used for is Bushcrafting, STOLing and all the fun connected to that. Maybe a bit of Front Line Low Level stuff as well.  


  • 0

       Es geht hier ja nicht um nichts, hier geht's ums Prinzip! (Without Life, we'd be dead)

                          9dNzTpe.jpg
                          2iW21Np.jpg


#122 6./ZG26_5tuka

6./ZG26_5tuka
  • Tester
  • Posts: 3931
  • Location:Germany

Posted 09 January 2017 - 12:11

Whichever they decide one, both have advantages and disadvantages. Po-2 is likely much less work than a fully fleshed out Li-2 but also terribly slow and less effective marketing wise.

Furthermore the Po-2 could serve as an observation and reconissence aircraft but that would create a lack in the LW plane set much like the current transport aircraft situation.

The Li-2 on the other hand would give the VVS a long desired alternative level bomber although quite inferiour to the Pe-2 with bad performence, protection and low payload.
  • 1

  YdcExnd.jpg Ju 87 D-3 4K Skin Template
Beta Tester Ju-52 Early Supporter Ju 52/3m g4 4K Skin Template


#123 CuteKitten94

CuteKitten94
  • Member
  • Posts: 113
  • Location:Camus Nightmare

Posted 09 January 2017 - 13:15

Whichever they decide one, both have advantages and disadvantages. Po-2 is likely much less work than a fully fleshed out Li-2 but also terribly slow and less effective marketing wise.

Furthermore the Po-2 could serve as an observation and reconissence aircraft but that would create a lack in the LW plane set much like the current transport aircraft situation.

The Li-2 on the other hand would give the VVS a long desired alternative level bomber although quite inferiour to the Pe-2 with bad performence, protection and low payload.

Well, all the players that think the Po-2 won't sell [Edited] They are just against women in Flight Simming. I am absolutely certain that it opens a completely New Market giving female players Heroes they can identify with, like the Night Witches to crush the Patriarchy of the 3rd Reich.

 

Why don't you want women in this game?


Edited by SYN_Haashashin, 19 January 2017 - 18:12.
Rule 7

  • 0

"Don't pick favourites, stand on all feet you have. Having preferences weakens your stance, makes you vulnerable and suck you down the Abyss of Life. Be quick on your feet. There is no Right, only varying stages of Wrong. It is this the only way to approach Belly Rubs."

rzXbCLJ.jpg

ZJkWZx1.jpg


#124 Caudron431Micha

Caudron431Micha
  • Founder
  • Posts: 343
  • Location:Alsace, France

Posted 09 January 2017 - 14:36

Female Soviet pilot flew bombers (587th Bomber Regiment, Pe2), fighters (586th Fighter Regiment, Yak1), types that we already have in game...They were not  only flying po2 as some seem to suddenly believe... :huh: 

 

That said i'm all for the Po2 at some point when we will have something like a Bf108 Taifun, those are more liaison types than cargo.To me Soviet cargo/transport should be Li2, it will make a more interesting thing to fly for dedicated cargo pilots.


  • 0

#125 Gambit21

Gambit21
  • Tester
  • Posts: 3648
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 09 January 2017 - 16:33

The Ju-52 is listed at 210kph,, yet ingame it is mostly flown around 230-240kph.


Documented @ 260-270kph, and happily does 260 in the sim.
When you say listed, where is that exactly? In the game itself? I haven't looked at it's page there yet.
  • 0
Posted Image Coming soon...Warrant Officer 'Yamaha Kawasaki' on the loose again! Posted Image

#126 6./ZG26_Klaus-Mann

6./ZG26_Klaus-Mann
  • Tester
  • Posts: 2205
  • Location:Aachen, Germany

Posted 09 January 2017 - 17:05

Documented @ 260-270kph, and happily does 260 in the sim.
When you say listed, where is that exactly? In the game itself? I haven't looked at it's page there yet.

That's Top Speed, but Cruising Speed is normally between 180-210. 

 

Cruise on the Po-2 is a civilian 110, but Maximum is around 155. 

 

Ingame People cruise the 52 at 230-240, so my guess is that the Po-2 will also be cruised at much higher Speeds than the Civilians one would. 


  • 0

       Es geht hier ja nicht um nichts, hier geht's ums Prinzip! (Without Life, we'd be dead)

                          9dNzTpe.jpg
                          2iW21Np.jpg


#127 Seacondor

Seacondor
  • Member
  • Posts: 30

Posted 10 January 2017 - 00:09

I really don't see the sense to another Bf109 when there are far more interesting planes that can be used to make

truly diverse missions. Having had a lot of experience with planes like the Storch and Hs123 I can see their value

when good missions are written for them. They make a good break from those fighter missions and their slower

pace means you get to fly longer in these relatively small maps. The Po.2 is good for this as well. They also add

more of a strategy element to the missions when it comes to surviving those annoying fighter attacks...   


  • 2

   B1Omr3_zpsuylfxbt5.jpg  Ten%20Days%20of%20Autumn_zps6qd563wq.png


#128 FFS_Cybermat47

FFS_Cybermat47
  • Founder
  • Posts: 2355
  • Location:New South Wales, Australia

Posted 10 January 2017 - 05:50

Something else to note about the Po-2: one of the developers (I think it was Han) said that they would like to do Korea at some point.

 

Guess what?

 

82_2.jpg

original.jpg


Edited by Cybermat47, 10 January 2017 - 05:51.

  • 1

qYvxNoF.jpg
"Stalin's fortress on fire! Is this madness or hell? The sound of the mortars, the music of death! We're playing the devil's symphony! Our violins are guns! Conducted from hell! Oh Stalingrad!"

- From Stalingrad by Sabaton.


#129 I./ZG1_Martijnvdm

I./ZG1_Martijnvdm
  • Founder
  • Posts: 884
  • Location:The Netherlands

Posted 10 January 2017 - 10:53

Wouldn't this be a better match with the Po-2?

 

Hs_126.jpg


  • 1

I7 4790K@4.7 GHz, MSI Z97 Gaming 5, Kingston HyperX Beast (t3) 16GB, MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X, Dell S2716DG, Samsung 850 Evo 500GB, Windows 10 64

   

         


#130 Gambit21

Gambit21
  • Tester
  • Posts: 3648
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 10 January 2017 - 15:28

no - but neat aircraft.


  • 0
Posted Image Coming soon...Warrant Officer 'Yamaha Kawasaki' on the loose again! Posted Image

#131 A-E-Hartmann

A-E-Hartmann
  • Tester
  • Posts: 1804
  • Location:France

Posted 15 January 2017 - 13:44

It would be very nice to see a Fieseler Storsch .

youtube.com/watch?v=bTEpbv5dHEQ

youtube.com/watch?v=tWIfme6ehpU


  • 0

462891Mabanniereil2.png


#132 I./JG1_Pragr

I./JG1_Pragr
  • Founder
  • Posts: 377
  • Location:Budweis, Czech Republic

Posted 18 January 2017 - 07:38

Wouldn't this be a better match with the Po-2?

 

Hs_126.jpg

 

Have no idea about the match with Po 2 but it would make more sense than Storch.

 

Storch is just a aero-taxi/liaison aircraft. There is absolutely no task it can fulfill in Il-2 game environment. Thus it's just a waste of limited resources. The Hs 126 is "better" plane since it was used for close tactical recon/artillery spotting missions. So it could be used to some extend.


  • 0

#133 Gambit21

Gambit21
  • Tester
  • Posts: 3648
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 18 January 2017 - 18:20

Eh...no
  • 0
Posted Image Coming soon...Warrant Officer 'Yamaha Kawasaki' on the loose again! Posted Image

#134 InProgress

InProgress
  • Member
  • Posts: 282

Posted 18 July 2017 - 21:51

I will just put this up :P would be great to get them, who needs another bf109
  • 2

acPYn5I.pngVGuafbO.png

Battle group south ☑ center ☑ north


#135 BlitzPig_EL

BlitzPig_EL
  • Member
  • Posts: 1692
  • Location:The Great Black Swamp of Ohio

Posted 19 July 2017 - 16:29

I'd still rather see the IAR 80/81 and I-153 than the Po-2 and Storch matchup.


  • 0

8wxp.jpg

Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov


#136 Gambit21

Gambit21
  • Tester
  • Posts: 3648
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 21 July 2017 - 01:37

No right or wrong here, but they're just 2 more fighters...we're not hurting for more of those where the Eastern Front is concerned.

I think the most valuable thing would be adding additional gameplay dynamics, which the Po-2 and Storch both offer.


  • 0
Posted Image Coming soon...Warrant Officer 'Yamaha Kawasaki' on the loose again! Posted Image

#137 6./ZG26_Klaus-Mann

6./ZG26_Klaus-Mann
  • Tester
  • Posts: 2205
  • Location:Aachen, Germany

Posted 21 July 2017 - 07:56

I'd still rather see the IAR 80/81 and I-153 than the Po-2 and Storch matchup.

I don't really see the Sorch having as much versatility as the Po-2, as much as I like it, I don't really see it having as much of a Place as a Fw189 which could also be used for harassment. 


  • 0

       Es geht hier ja nicht um nichts, hier geht's ums Prinzip! (Without Life, we'd be dead)

                          9dNzTpe.jpg
                          2iW21Np.jpg


#138 BlitzPig_EL

BlitzPig_EL
  • Member
  • Posts: 1692
  • Location:The Great Black Swamp of Ohio

Posted 21 July 2017 - 11:07

For offline I can see the Storch kind of working, well except for the AI AAA gunners that will shred it at every turn.

 

In multiplayer it will be a slow, short ride to a smoking hole in the ground as it will be easy prey for even the most inexperienced pilots, and still have to deal with the AI AAA gunners.


  • 0

8wxp.jpg

Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov


#139 Gambit21

Gambit21
  • Tester
  • Posts: 3648
  • Location:Pacific Northwest

Posted 21 July 2017 - 20:49

I think the challenge of ingress/egress at tree top level, using terrain and clouds on the Kuban map would be too much fun. :)


  • 1
Posted Image Coming soon...Warrant Officer 'Yamaha Kawasaki' on the loose again! Posted Image

#140 6./ZG26_Klaus-Mann

6./ZG26_Klaus-Mann
  • Tester
  • Posts: 2205
  • Location:Aachen, Germany

Posted 27 August 2017 - 16:06

This is to all those who think Po-2 and Storch won't work in Il-2. (Seriously though, I want that Reg Number)

 

Polikarpov_Po_2.jpg


Edited by 6./ZG26_Klaus_Mann, 27 August 2017 - 16:07.

  • 4

       Es geht hier ja nicht um nichts, hier geht's ums Prinzip! (Without Life, we'd be dead)

                          9dNzTpe.jpg
                          2iW21Np.jpg


#141 BlitzPig_EL

BlitzPig_EL
  • Member
  • Posts: 1692
  • Location:The Great Black Swamp of Ohio

Posted 27 August 2017 - 23:27

:lol:

 

Well played sir.


  • 0

8wxp.jpg

Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov


#142 indiaciki

indiaciki
  • Founder
  • Posts: 1268
  • Location:Belgrade, Serbia

Posted 28 August 2017 - 01:27

Po-2


  • 0

#143 InProgress

InProgress
  • Member
  • Posts: 282

Posted 28 August 2017 - 16:42

Why would you fly with it into enemy territory? This can work in multiplayer with missions around friendly territory, fly from airfield to airfield with officer, evacuate someone, recon mission etc. Fly low and do task far away from frontline and should be good. I would rather buy this than another version bf109. New plane, new gameplay options, more fun while new fighter will not bring anything new to game. After these little planes I would love to see seaplane (:
  • 1

acPYn5I.pngVGuafbO.png

Battle group south ☑ center ☑ north


#144 216th_Lucas_From_Hell

216th_Lucas_From_Hell
  • Member
  • Posts: 3430
  • Location:3-я улица Строителей, дом 25, квартира 12

Posted 28 August 2017 - 16:50

Reconnaissance, night bombing, artillery spotting, SAR, supporting Partisan operations, sneaky low altitude daylight bombing... I'd definitely take the U-2 all the way to Berlin if I could.

Servers like Random Expert reward that. Coming in between the trees and following roads and rivers until you bump into something, drop a pair of FAB there, alert the position and head home.
  • 0

#145 RainMan

RainMan
  • Founder
  • Posts: 83
  • Location:Norman, OK, USA

Posted 28 August 2017 - 17:32

+1 for the Storch. 


  • 0
Callsign: "RainMan"
 
PC: Intel Core i7-4790K 4.0GHz @ 4.8GHz | MSI GTX 1080 TI 11GB | ASUS Maximus VII Hero | G.SKILL Trident X Series 32GB RAM | 27" Acer Monitor (2560x1440) | 512GB Samsung 850 PRO SSD | Win10 Pro 64bit | Oculus Rift CV1
 

#146 6./ZG26_Klaus-Mann

6./ZG26_Klaus-Mann
  • Tester
  • Posts: 2205
  • Location:Aachen, Germany

Posted 16 October 2017 - 14:46

To do this kind of stuff

 

youtube.com/watch?v=fbFtWaRGoF8


  • 0

       Es geht hier ja nicht um nichts, hier geht's ums Prinzip! (Without Life, we'd be dead)

                          9dNzTpe.jpg
                          2iW21Np.jpg





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users