Tactical Air War

[=LG=Coldman 496]

DEVS!!! add pls G-6 late next week when it comes to TAW plane set 😄

[174Sqn_Brannon 12]

Nice promo trailer =LG=.  Enjoyed it.

[=TH=Denisik 68]

7 hours ago, =LG=Coldman said:

 

 

 

Nice flights! 1 shot - one kill, this is bad, the developers of the game did it wrong, the plane should not fall from the 1st hit ... Now we are waiting for the same video for the Reds)

[ACG_Andy 0]

Is it possible to have my password reset? I was registered as 69th_Andy but changed my name to ACG_Andy and now I'm locked out of that account on TAW

[[GCA]T1m270 101]

Website Cities display is broken after restart. 

[O_Mollusc 7]

8 hours ago, ACG_Andy said:

Is it possible to have my password reset? I was registered as 69th_Andy but changed my name to ACG_Andy and now I'm locked out of that account on TAW

Did you change your official IL-2 in-game name to match the new one?

[=TH=mincer 371]

Does anyone actually enjoy the campaign? IMHO the first 2 + maybe third maps were fun and interesting, then it all turned into an endless boring swamp. 

[=LG=todeskvlt 463]

12 hours ago, =22AMG=Denisik said:

Nice flights! 1 shot - one kill, this is bad, the developers of the game did it wrong, the plane should not fall from the 1st hit

 

You can do the same if you learn how to shoot good instead of crashing on enemy hangars like yesterday.

[=TH=mincer 371]

2 minutes ago, =LG=todeskvlt said:

 

You can do the same if you learn how to shoot good 

Really? We really can do that?

[=TH=Denisik 68]

14 minutes ago, =LG=todeskvlt said:

 

You can do the same if you learn how to shoot good instead of crashing on enemy hangars like yesterday.

Do you want to say that you shoot well ?!))) Go behind the red, and repeat the result, then you can talk to. Home aces of Goering.

16 minutes ago, =LG=todeskvlt said:

 

crashing on enemy hangars

If you're already falling, then why not fall into the hangar?)

[=2ndSS=Lawyer1 484]

26 minutes ago, =LG=todeskvlt said:

 

You can do the same if you learn how to shoot good 

20 vs 40 ? 😁

Edited November 14, 2020 by =2ndSS=Lawyer1

[Operation_Antifa 502]

1 hour ago, mincer said:

Does anyone actually enjoy the campaign? IMHO the first 2 + maybe third maps were fun and interesting, then it all turned into an endless boring swamp. 

 

Not a fan of the airfield meta anymore?

[=TH=mincer 371]

Just now, Operation_Ivy said:

 

Not a fan of the airfield meta anymore?

I am now fan of "stack the server while the opponents are not there" meta.

[=2ndSS=Lawyer1 484]

27 minutes ago, =LG=todeskvlt said:

 

 crashing on enemy hangars like yesterday.

This is "Jummer style" ))

[=LG=todeskvlt 463]

1 hour ago, =22AMG=Denisik said:

Go behind the red, and repeat the result, then you can talk to. Home aces of Goering.

 

I've never played red side planes but i will try it. Thanks

[[110]xJammer 119]

@=LG=Kathon

 

Given the current ruleset where "life-lost ban" pilots are permitted to fly if the opposite team has more players.

 

Currently:

 

a "banned" player is able to fly, and in case the life is lost, the ban time does not change, while the life counter is still incremented until it is in the positive, enabling such pilot to fly straight away.

 

Would it be possible to either:

 

a) Cause the lives lost during such flights to "go into the negative" and provide +1 life every 20 hours of bantime (while refreshing 20h ban as long as the life counter is still in the negative). Therefore such pilots are able to choose to fly, but still risk losing their lives still. Moreover they do still have the opportunity during such time to make up their lost lives by getting CMs.

 

b) Alternatively any time such a pilot loses life, the ban time is refreshed.

 

As its done now, a banned pilot has little incentive to still care about staying alive under such circumstances, while with the above proposal they'd have direct motivation to not only stay alive, but also earn CMs.  

Edited November 14, 2020 by [110]xJammer

[=TH=Denisik 68]

You fly in the majority - you appreciate life. Fly to the minority, get bonuses. Or are you not happy that 20 reds fight back 40 blues?

There is a proposal, it seems to have already been written before me. Make cover at the airfield as in the warehouses, so that they are resurrected within 10 minutes.

[Operation_Antifa 502]

*yawn* we get it guys, you are nearly as heroic as the real pilots of the VVS. Nevermind that the map is very advantageous to red. Not that i am complaining about that but the whole pity tour is getting old.

 

 

Edited November 14, 2020 by Operation_Ivy

[=OPFR=TheCubanSpy 10]

7 hours ago, mincer said:

I am now fan of "stack the server while the opponents are not there" meta.

 

Numbers were even when we last met, even started out with Reds outnumbering Blues. What's the problem?

[=2ndSS=Lawyer1 484]

2 hours ago, Operation_Ivy said:

Nevermind that the map is very advantageous to red

🤣

The map is so profitable that the Reds lost almost all of their airfields in one day.

Edited November 14, 2020 by =2ndSS=Lawyer1

[Norz 141]

3 hours ago, Operation_Ivy said:

 Nevermind that the map is very advantageous to red.

 

Can you share some details with us?

[Operation_Antifa 502]

Just look at the map design. It basically boils down to Tuapse being very difficult to take because there is no pathway from Gelendzhik. So Blue has to conquer the city of Neftyanaya and possibly Saratovskaya first to be able to attack Tuapse directly. Defending Neftyanaya is a lot easier for VVS than for LW to attack it due to Krasnodar being very far away. You can argue that Maikop is a lot closer to the City than Krasnodar but keeping Maikop disabled is also relatively easy because supply missions to it take very long.

 

On the other hand, no LW airfield has a similar advantageous position. I am not against VVS having an advantage but don't be ignorant towards it.

[=FSG=FRITZ 23]

 

This is observed regularly. Why does something not respond?

[=2ndSS=Lawyer1 484]

2 hours ago, Operation_Ivy said:

Just look at the map design. It basically boils down to Tuapse being very difficult to take because there is no pathway from Gelendzhik. So Blue has to conquer the city of Neftyanaya and possibly Saratovskaya first to be able to attack Tuapse directly. Defending Neftyanaya is a lot easier for VVS than for LW to attack it due to Krasnodar being very far away. You can argue that Maikop is a lot closer to the City than Krasnodar but keeping Maikop disabled is also relatively easy because supply missions to it take very long.

 

On the other hand, no LW airfield has a similar advantageous position. I am not against VVS having an advantage but don't be ignorant towards it.

What are the problems to capture Neftyanaya? For example, the Reds, having one third fewer the number of pilots, two missions in a row managed to capture Maikop, although the distance to it from Tuapse is farther than from Krasnodar to  Neftyanaya

[72AG_SerWolf 63]

blue pilots grown their streaks

[Xiaozhan 22]

We can force Germany to draw the map again. Fight on, Comrades！

 

[Norz 141]

9 hours ago, Operation_Ivy said:

On the other hand, no LW airfield has a similar advantageous position. I am not against VVS having an advantage but don't be ignorant towards it.

 

This map is  the same for both sides. We will see it the same way for axis on the map No8.

 

8 hours ago, =FSG=FRITZ said:

 

This is observed regularly. Why does something not respond?

 

What is the probem here?

Edited November 15, 2020 by Norz

[ACG_DerSheriff 1519]

8 hours ago, =FSG=FRITZ said:

 

This is observed regularly. Why does something not respond?

What? ACG? ACG is a super large group. Beyond that they are split up in squadrons which fly together in ACGs internal campaign. Those are often flying together on taw too. Its quite possible that the guys on the screenshot never talked to each other in the past.

[=KG76=flyus747 111]

Imagine if the reds win this map because of the tanks. Pushed to a corner with an untouchable AF actually checkmate blues.

 

Blue tanks spawn at a 2:1 ratio as they launch their attacks from multiple directions but this is proving to be its achilles heel as it now means reds have the means to destroy blue tanks at this 2:1 ratio. Of course, much of these problems could be mitigated if only the blues invested time and effort to supply Maikop, instead of wandering the ends of the world with their 109s and fockes.

[Operation_Antifa 502]

21 minutes ago, =KG76=flyus747 said:

Of course, much of these problems could be mitigated if only the blues invested time and effort to supply Maikop, instead of wandering the ends of the world with their 109s and fockes.

 

You can't win a resupply vs airfield damage race. It is much easier to destroy an airfield than to resupply and get it repaired.

[=LG=Mad_Mikhael 198]

The blue team just need more suiciders. And grow their streaks in being dead.

Edited November 15, 2020 by =LG=Mad_Mikhael

[=KG76=flyus747 111]

1 hour ago, Operation_Ivy said:

 

You can't win a resupply vs airfield damage race. It is much easier to destroy an airfield than to resupply and get it repaired.

If only the 109s and fockes could do something about that, wouldn’t that be nice?

[=2ndSS=Lawyer1 484]

25 minutes ago, =LG=Mad_Mikhael said:

The blue team just need more suiciders.

Great idea 👍

[ACG_Medln 1]

12 hours ago, =FSG=FRITZ said:

 

This is observed regularly. Why does something not respond?

as a ACG member I can confirm that we are all axis tryhards where some of us on the allied side give out information where the russians are currently at to get the ultimate advantage

[=FSG=FRITZ 23]

4 hours ago, DerSheriff said:

What? ACG? ACG is a super large group. Beyond that they are split up in squadrons which fly together in ACGs internal campaign. Those are often flying together on taw too. Its quite possible that the guys on the screenshot never talked to each other in the past.

So what? Does this give them the right to violate the RULES of the server? Especially, I have to take into account that they are sitting in a third-party Teamspeak , and when the blue ACGs came out, the red ones - went to the Teamspeak TAW. "Its quite possible that the guys on the screenshot never talked to each other in the past."

 

 

Edited November 15, 2020 by =FSG=FRITZ

[=TH=mincer 371]

Chute killing at TAW:
 

 

[Norz 141]

4 minutes ago, =FSG=FRITZ said:

So what? Does this give them the right to violate the RULES of the server? Especially, I have to take into account that they are sitting in a third-party vehicle, and when the blue ACGs came out, the red ones - went to the teamspeak TAW. "Its quite possible that the guys on the screenshot never talked to each other in the past."

 

What is your problem?

[=FSG=FRITZ 23]

3 minutes ago, Norz said:

 

What is your problem?

 

I have no problems. And you? I appeal to the server administration with a question about the violation of the rules. Are you an administration? If not - walk, Vasya.

 

[Norz 141]

2 minutes ago, =FSG=FRITZ said:

 

I have no problems. And you? I appeal to the server administration with a question about the violation of the rules. Are you an administration? If not - walk, Vasya.

 

 

I saw nothing like that: 2 Admins: xxx xx  x x x.

 

Next time be more clear or use the private message to admins.

[ACG_Prancing2 123]

The only reason why reds are drawing maps is because the average blue pilots are terribly bad. Another reason to apply a squadrons balancing for the next TAW's

@=FSG=FRITZ that topic have already been discussed, go search for it instead of re-posting useless complaints. 

Edited November 15, 2020 by ACG_Prancing