Jump to content

Rama

Moderators
  • Content Count

    2074
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rama

  1. Rama

    MODS OFF

    No. The list of mods given by Feathered has nothing to do with hacks, since none of them were modifying the game code. If you want to use the word "hack", then use it for what it's appropriate. This also is totally uneeded in this discussion.
  2. Rama

    MODS OFF

    A mod is nothing but a "User created content"
  3. Rama

    MODS OFF

    This kind of malicious urban legend insinuation is rather dismal.... I would even say a bit stinky... Moreover, it is spreading false and harmfull information, thus breaking forum rule #17 So, now every post should be consensual... I really don't get you. Are you not the same person hardly defending the liberty of speech? everybody posting should follow the main stream or shut up? Ok.... then why this post of you? by your own standard, it is useless. Maybe.... and then? Has he attacked you personally in this thread? No.... so do you have any reason to attack him? No So aga
  4. Rama

    MODS OFF

    I mostly agree with what you said (including the benefit of modding, player options, etc...), .... and will of course never pretend mod tools don't help for modding, this would be totally stupid. I just object to those telling "modding is dead", that no, restricted mod access and unavailability of modding tools don't stop some peoples to mod, as the history of modding prove it in the Il2, RoF and BoS game. But as I allready say, I'm 100% for a "mods on" mode and think it's a bad move for the dev not to include it in the game.
  5. Rama

    MODS OFF

    I totally agree with this. "Mods on" mode helps the modders a lot. This doesn't resist the hard facts. Modding has been done on IL2, RoF and BoS without mod tools delivered to everyone by the developers.... Many mods (most of them actually...) have still been done without any official mod tool released.
  6. Rama

    MODS OFF

    Even with no "mods on" mode, some third party content will not have to be coded into the game to be used, like for example the BOSparser or the "simple mission builder", and.... No, I don't see much difference between a third party content that can be used in game (and choosen to be used or not by the player) becausit it was officially approved and some non-approved usable on "mods-on" mode. And it's anyway a will for a lot of modders to see their work being fully integrated in the core game. I still agree a "mods on" mode in desirable.... but if it can help the modders (so they can see
  7. Rama

    MODS OFF

    I am also , you missed it? keyword is "now"... when zeus started, it wasn't for the dev team and not for profit. I know, I helped him a little bit. Little accessibility isn't none.... so there will be mods in this area too, as there are allready in the work in other areas. I'm also disapointed, I told it clearly.... I would like to have a "mods on" mode. .... but not only isn't it the end of the world, but it isn't also the end of modding.
  8. Rama

    MODS OFF

    You probably missed "IMO". So no, there's no internal contradiction in this opinion. Works for you, don't work for me or many others... CFS1, 2 and 3 modding were ugly mess for me and lots of other peoples..... that played IL2 and prefered it even if the modding was "under control". You can leave the ideology aside, this is a discussion, not a preaching arena. It's clear you're a tenant of "free modding".... good for you, that's an opinion like another.... but accept that other don't share it, and that in any case you will never see total free modding in a game which is still
  9. Rama

    MODS OFF

    wrong, all the modders that start modding you can later see in the game didn't start for profit. A very few of them then are hired by the dev, but it wasn't the initial intention. There are plenty of stuff in IL2 (in the official versions), RoF or BoS that has been done, is actually done, and will be done, truely freely (without 1 kopek profit). I did some myself, and know lot of guys who did to, so I know what I'm talking about. Doesn't matter much. Lots of modder don't really care if their goal is to do something they want to have in game and are good enough to do it. It's quite normal
  10. Acusing the dev of bias, denial of history or of displaying propaganda is an attack. So please don't say you're not attacking anyone.... you clearly are. Now you know it, better stop it and make your point was valid arguments, like technical information and data.
  11. Rama

    MODS OFF

    modding for BOS allready happened (for example with the VL map), do happen now and will happen in the future.
  12. Ca ne les a jamais empêché de hurler et de se lamenter, d'être au courant depuis longtemps....
  13. Rama

    MODS OFF

    No, this isn't the correct figure. Mods started long before, even before 1946... a big proportion of 1946 (terrain, planes, etc...) was made of mods. There were plenty of modders working for IL2 and submitting their works to the devs (you can check the . But the mod integration within the game was totally controlled by the dev until some of the modding tools (ungtp) were made public and used in an uncontrolled way. (that also started a little before development ceased). No, you can do more and not much is locked (except FM and DM). And even when it is in game (like for new maps for exam
  14. Faut pas exagérer.... le premier Ju52 doit faire un peu mal... après... c'est que du plaisir...
  15. Well, I'm hoping for a compromise. Moscow with full historical city area is certainly a potential problem for FPS. A smaller extent with the Kremlin and the red square in the center would I think satisfy most of the players.
  16. All posts about Mods-on mode have been moved into the "MODS OFF" thread HeffMurfs especially created for this discussion. Please continue this discussion in the specific thread, and keep the current one for other subjects related to DD88.
  17. Peut-être, mais ça on s'en fout.... les états d'âme ne font jamais avancer le schmilblick... La seule vraie question c'est est-ce qu'on veut ce jeu, et est-ce qu'on veut pouvoir ou non faire des mods sans trop de contraintes. Si la réponse aux deux questions est positive, alors il va falloir discuter, faire des sondages, discuter encore, refaire des sondages.... et peut-être dans quelques mois les devs changeront d'avis.
  18. La vraie raison est sans doute que les unlocks continuent d'exister pour les non-premium.... (ce qui est sans doute incompatible avec un mode "mods on") Les unlocks nous ont aussi confirmé quelque chose: rien n'est jamais gravé dans le marbre...
  19. Maybe, but basically there's no WW view in game, and there won't be. Only wonder tattletale will stay on the forum, until forum's end.
  20. Yes, it was said at least once by a dev that the wonderwoman view will not be implemented.
  21. And my daughter is the Pope... Stop spamming please.
  22. The OP message looks like a bad automatic translation and has not much to do with French language. kind of spam?
  23. Pour ce que j'en sais, la ville de Moscou sera très probablement présente. Par contre, il ne faut pas s'attendre à voir l'empreinte historique complète (pour les raisons évoquées par Pips) Jason prend des précautions dans ses annonces, et c'est normal.
×
×
  • Create New...