Jump to content

VBF-12_Pequod

Members
  • Content Count

    31
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

44 Excellent

About VBF-12_Pequod

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

441 profile views
  1. I agree. No PTO would be a major setback IMHO.
  2. Yaks, Macchi, 190s, Stuka, Rata, Mig... Oh, and Hs129. Don't ask me why. I just don't like them.
  3. Don't play with my feelings, LuseKofte.
  4. First one: 2 Arm. Div., 66 Arm. Reg., 3 Bn. USA 3036754, G 2 "Goldie" https://www.mediafire.com/view/ek5uy1pd94j74bj/M4A2_Goldie.dds/file
  5. Maybe that's too harsh, Detcord. Tank Crew it's still a bit unripe, butI'm sure it's gonna be the best coop tank warfare experience ever. Sherman is finally here! Let's enjoy and remember: the best is yet to come.
  6. Maybe I'm a dreamer, but imagine a bomber-centric expansion in TF 6.0. All efforts centered on a flyable multicrew B-17F during 1942 and early 1943 would attract bomber guys in masse. Unescorted raids over sub pens in Saint Nazaire or Brest would be a blast. Less aircrafts (maybe early Gustavs and some Antons) and only one map, just make the fortress the star of the show. Maybe would be a bold and risky move, but I'd be in from day one.
  7. I'm with sevenless. Virtual LW pilots are far more experienced than real german pilots during '44 and '45. They also fight in equal (when not superior) numbers. Facing large streams of bombers with heavy escort would be a different story.
  8. I'm a Sherman lover too! About its use in BoBp we face two (little) problems: iirc this version was only used by the americans on D-day and in the PTO, and it'll have russian tankers.
×
×
  • Create New...