Jump to content

carve_gybe

Members
  • Content Count

    39
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About carve_gybe

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

562 profile views
  1. Patrick, I feel I must clarify. I am not acquainted with the substance of PWCG, so my dismissal of it could justifiably be seen as unjustified. Being of the attention deficit persuasion, I must say I was sufficiently put off by the GUI, and the need actually to try to figure out which planes I have and don't have, to the point that by the time the puzzle of the various settings was put in front of me....I switched off. My ignorance of PWCG is therefore entirely my fault and perhaps also attributable to the limited time I have to try new things. Based on the feedback I can read in the f
  2. So for some reason I managed to complete two chapters in part 2 of the campaign and then I realised there is also part 1. I figured I better start from the beginning and I completed chapter 1 of part 1 now as well. This isn't exactly the chronological path of the Battle of Stalingrad. Ignoring the fact that I am an idiot for not noticing there is a part 1 that precedes part 2, why did the game allow me to jump forward? Also, my Lagg-5 is still locked and it isn't terribly clear at what point this plane unlocks. Or is it that the only way to fly Lagg-5 is to pay for it? I do really comp
  3. I've said it before and I'll say it again: developing the missions/campaigns for SP use does not need to be extra cost for the devs. People would pay...
  4. What about using the reflecting thingy that attaches to the hat rather than the clip? No wires required. Is the head tracking performance degraded with that?
  5. What is currently the best head movement kit out there? Not looking for VR. Is trackir5 the obvious choice? Thanks!
  6. Does anyone know how to get the fully zoomed out view when looking at your six? Is it a trackir parameter?? If I move my head towards the monitor and then turn around then I get it, but this is likely to cause spinal injuries in the long term. The idea is to have the back seat as small as possible. At the moment i see nothing but back seat when I turn around. Any ideas? I play with Requiem's trackir profile... Thanks!
  7. I know this was answered somewhere but I can't find it. I am doing low level bombing with 2 x FAB100. I smoked the control tower but was given credit only for soft targets. Do I need plant the bombs on the runway itself? Anywhere or in the middle? Thanks guys
  8. Hi Lucas_from_hell Thanks for that! Didn't know about PWCG...it seemed like another acronym I didn't want to explore... Will look at it. It may be what I've been missing. C_G
  9. Here's a thought. Consider me - I am over 40 and I love the way principle of flight. Simming is the only way I can truly enjoy flight. Most importantly, I have lots of disposable income which I will spend readily if I can improve my experience and feel more joy of flight. Now here's my problem: I don't have the time to become very good at flying my Lagg-3 to make an impact playing MP. I don't have a man-cave to participate in teamspeak, which is a must to survive, as loanwolfing in Lagg-3 is suicidal. So I am resigned to a pretty crap SP campaign which is fast exceeding my abilities. Now I am
  10. I am a newbie here as well. So far I have found the following useful: 1. Make sure hardware/software/settings are optimised. This includes joystick, TrackIR settings, graphics settings to increase contrast (helps to spot enemies), large monitor, appropriate resolution, etc. Also, in control panel to go "set up USB game controllers" and run the set up to make sure your joystick is centred when not touched. 2. Pick a plane and stick with it for a while, so that you don't have shallow experience on many planes and you steepen your learning curve on one plane 3. Try to minimise reliance on "
  11. But: http://www.tested.com/tech/pcs/453848-buying-your-new-monitor-part-one-what-get/ What now?
  12. Hi All So I have been running IL-BOS on 15.4 laptop with Nvidia GTX 680M...on some resolution lower than 1920 x 1080... ...and I could not find the enemy.. so my posterior has been lit on fire fairly regularly. I also had Sweet FX installed and gamma set to .65. I also did that whole .ini file edit, but that's gone now anyway. When I switched to 1920 x 1080 I lost some FPS and I am still dogfighting blind. I got rid of SweetFX anyway as it was crashing my system on occasion and didn't really help with spotting. So the next step is to get a larger monitor. I have no hope of
  13. Interesting stuff. There seems to be some consent that early jets are nice to try on DCS. When I was growing up I regularly heard MIG-21s breaking the sound barrier on training flights. That alone may be enough for me to give DCS a try. I still remember the propaganda-rich radio announcement when the air force of my country acquired the MIG-21s for the first time...they said spoke of delivery of a modern fighter capable of locating and destroying the F-16.... Capability is one thing, probability is another... but that's propaganda for you! Anyway, back to WWII...thanks for all the
  14. Sorry, I just realised this topic is discussed here: http://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/8092-how-does-dcs-compare-bos/page-3 My impression from reading the above thread is that DCS is not a good option for dogfighting WWII planes. Would anyone disagree?
  15. Does anyone fly both IL-2 BOS and DCS? How do they compare? I only returned recently to flight sims after decades of non-play. Things have surely changed since my F-15 Strike Eagle plane was able to fly straight up from take off to 80,000 feet....and landings were made by flying over a triangle on the ground... I just learned about the existence of DCS and wonder if I should try it. I don't have a lot of spare time and my biggest fear is that I'll get addicted and cause my wife to boot me out with my PC and joystick... I understand the high-level difference between the two, bu
×
×
  • Create New...