Jump to content


Founders [standard]
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by raaaid

  1. yes thats what i was trying to visualize after making the thread and realized so unless i was wrong and the "effect" the artist used was coincidence, many planes in the same spot in the click of the picture and then just empty air
  2. i hope the video is right unfortunaly i broke my headphones several points: if you use headphones you want binaural if you use speakers stereo, so for pc games you want binaural theres a youtube around which shows clod at certain stage binaural, but it was removed, seems they were too much ahead singer mics have both channels in the same spot aiming different, so this records on what i call pseudostereo(not 3d location at all just one channel louder than the other), for example you cant locate in space neither a radio locutor nor a singer check out how this top of the line sound engineering was made by an average joe with a dummy recording head , you can even check height of the sound use headphones:
  3. well its been more than ten years soon itll be 20 :o
  4. good point it could be just a snapshot, a coincidence of many planes in the picture fov if you look with very high zoom a plane distant 100 m and other 200 m theyll appear with almost eqaul angular size anyway im almost sure the airfix artist didnt bother to use maths in his projection edit: now that you mention i think the future of virtual reality goes as you point ending in samll domes planetarium like edit: one question four you: that affinity seems like 4 screen in a row lot of lateral peripheral HORIZONTAL view but little VERTICAL peripheral view why so unbalnced? why the screens like this oooo when could be more balanced like this: oo oo edit: well now thinking a while i can answer my own quetion: why eyefinity extends the horizontal fov but not the vertical? fps users are a majority and the pesky shooters mostly come from left of right though of course the mraketing guys will sell it to flight simmers without lying by saying and improvemnet in LATERAL view knowing we subcounciously will understand PERIPHERAL
  5. thats a brunette here a blonde though 2:14 makes me think shes dyed:
  6. what your pointing out is just extending the horizontal but thats what not i meant as a matter of fact im not very sure of the exact artist trick the best i can explain it is he paints planes bigger than they should you can see it here too
  7. in my previous post i had started typing how in the live for speed forums in my lerts avatar i was bullied like hell by kids in a time in which i had a fragil mind contrary to now fitting in a mature not following the norm comunity and the thing they did most usually was pretending not to understand and put not intended ideas in my words now youre doing it can you tell me why they did it? and how comes i wrote about it and deleted before you did it, precognition? corgito ergo sum but you may be very well a product of my mind, yet i catalogue you in the amusing group
  8. oh yes i reread it and see what you mean but i disagree for european air war and janess wwii had quite good graphics as a matter of fact with my pc i run similar graphic to those in 98
  9. oh you sound like outlaw ill make you an scheme: why most old games shew real footage and new dont? option one by you= resolution option two by me and others=fatalities which raises pegi should ros include real footage? me: yes but with no fatalities, is this important? no why did i post this? because im a human who needs to express himself and thats what the net is for whats good cause bars are expensive, in other words cause i was bored
  10. yeah i posted there asking for observatory non damaging bullets besides what do you think my agenda is? have a nice conversation as in a pub with people with the same hobby than me and of course not neceseraly about the hobby, waiting for people to run out of coments and start chatting ot as the ubizoo definitly im crazy along these ten years on flightsims i never got to dislike anybody and dont you have an agenda identical to mine?
  11. the contribution im proud the most was a thread at ubisoft long ago in which i posted that certain pilot got roasted extracrispy message in the console should be substituted by certain pilot got murdered everybody called me a troll but it was later in clod what you see as attention calling is just my too much free time and creative personality,creativty calls attention in this world where education kills it(you memorize how to solve problems dont face them in a creative manner) just ace question yourself: how many of the sugestion-contributions in forums came from your mind and how many you heard them before? as a matter of fact i was posting on 6dof via trackir before it reached the market, maybe even before it was developed but ace i like you as a detractor for your weapons are humour edit: besides i dont want to inlfuence the devs as most to get the game in my favour, for example making mouse view favourable over trackir by asking for cockpit off but i see it im helping to do something great ive noticed many people want to manipulate things to get their favourite rides uber, some manipulate to destroy the game... i think it was tully who put it clearest: what saves my ass every day from the ban hammer is my absolute lack of bad intention
  12. oh yeah its peral harbour ben afleck played a rogue squadron in which americans fought bob when i dream of duels with spitfires i just see planes siloute just as that movie boy that movie is fire iron cast in my mind i assure you its pearl harbour
  13. check out the difference between this: basically one is full of life while the others plain you may wonder why: the artist used a trick by which he uses a 90?
  14. pearl harbour 2002 my god im such a nerd i can tell a spit for a 109 almost at any angle just in one 10th of second
  15. the thing im waiting to use facetracknoir is two independent axes for each yawing side, which i read is coming then my 5 eyro webcam which i got for free and can run 30 fps will make me competitive to trackirs it would be great if the game integrted 6dof via webcam and coms, im too lazy to use a not integrated comms
  16. actually this in few months will run out of sales trackir if it hasnt already: http://facetracknoir.sourceforge.net/home/default.htm
  17. its not the same cockpit on or off in no canopy planes that one with bars also if i had trackir i would not fly cockpit off cockpit on with the bars issue which doesnt happen in rof planes puts at huge disadvantage the person who has not trackir maybe this changes by facetracknoir which i bet future version 1.8 ill be able to use and before you say it why dont i buy one well you should see the situation of spain, massive evictions, 1 out of 4 unemployed, like me, thank god for the only good thing of catholicism, the consistence of families, maybe the buble is bursting? as they say about the future of sapin a country of empy houses and people without house,talk of crazyness resume: enforced cockpit on puts at disadavanatge those whithout trackir in wwii but not in wwi(the bars issue) this forum is not representation of customer reality for 99% of people here have trackir while most players like me lack it
  18. no im saying back in 98 we cared more for flight models than eye candy now seems the opposite since the most perfectly historically acurate model, that is footaged reality, is not good enough for not having enough level of eye candy besides the realistic aproach is killing the games from the 2000, see what happened to adventure games when 3d models came why not vangoghs or dalies designing games how about an option to run your game in just two colours, i bet well get 32 trillions of colours before this how about making a game oil paint style? matematicians should be making the flying models but let artist who care for originality do the graphics if i did the game i would make the sky just as in this video, proably as it is behind the skydome and the planes deep black:
  19. gosh maybe im old bbut in my times we called that eye candy and care more for flight models seems today eye candy its called graphics and flying models doesnt matter any more since real images cant be a better flying models yet is not an image sweet enough so not valid
  20. well if were gonna talk about an inexistent yet game if we dont broad the subject things get lame how about a 140 char limit as in tweeter? its red iron cast on my mind an spit out turning a 109 in his tail or a strafing of a locomotive eaw real footage nice touch so i suggest it which brings the question of why this got lost
  21. how is a suggestion to add real footage to bos is ot? if you dont like my posts put me on your ignore list and it will be like i exist no longer for you, you wont see these threads, which is a new feature in forums since beofre even if in ignore list you would see threads started by that person
  22. observation bullets as in clod i bet im not the only one who likes competing but not virtually killing
  23. yeah what do you prefere teh universe as a supercomputer rendering a real physics at 800*600 or pacman engine at 1000000*1000000000
  24. once i jumped on a newbee server with stall off and several guys accused me of cheating for i was out turning their zeros with my 190, what was happening they were young padawans who think more is more and myself more experience i know less is more in other words they were pulling their joysticks fully and i pulled it less so they were turning very very far from ideal sustained turning speed and i did it at the right speed and this makes me think based on graphs and experience that the old games were wrong since the key to victory was getting it closer to the spin limit and the new games, from 2002, some plane models got it righ some wrong: il2 46: right flying model for the 109 wrong for the spit , one had to be flown to the limit, unrealistic, the other close to the turning speed, realistic it hppens the same with the camel which has to be turnt to the limit which i see unrealistic according graphs and the vii and viif which turn best at an ideal speed, more realistic where less is more according my experience in dreams( the most perfect simulation so you try thing as in a very real manner without getting heart) as a experten :wub: i can say that 99% of turning duels are won by the person who pullls less the stick, edit: ive seen some footage if real planes were like the games most planes would stall under fire, most dint
  25. well found the name of the concept,winscape when i had the idea in 2003 i called it gunsight effect since gunsight reticles work exactly in this principle i think it would be a homemade to the decisive 40s incorporate gunsight tech into todays games in which we pretend to fight for freedom against those who pretend to fight for the opposite i have to say if i searched the ubizoo i could proof i had this idea back in 2003 so they wouldnt have to pay winscape for i gave for free the idea to the comunity edit: now think of 3d screen tech as nintendo ds3d it can show independent images for two persons in two positions :wub: so when we take a plane, better, when i take a plane i cant be SURE the plane is flying or is on ground some guys shaking it and im seeing a winscape, well with 3d tech it could be even we, i measured earth radius and its actually 600 km
  • Create New...