Jump to content

AvengerSeawolf

Members
  • Content Count

    251
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

13 Good

About AvengerSeawolf

  • Rank
    Member
  1. Amazing work keeps getting better in every new image released. Keeep it going Thumbs up. I applause and wait forward for it.
  2. I think the best would be to write a PM to the developers, they will be able to find the solution to this and answer your questions.
  3. Sooner or latter it will happen and will be affordable for the general public. AMD is developing to this http://gadgets.ndtv.com/games/features/amd-plans-to-do-for-vr-what-it-did-for-pc-game-development-679513
  4. Yes you just need a joystick, nothing stupid about not having one. I suggest the speedlink phantom hawk if you look for something capable on entry level in good price.
  5. Appreciate your constructive input Andy, thanks helps understand something. Yes I have posted 2 tracks there.
  6. Physics in WT on the sim mode are IMO ( and that's what counts for me cause I will play the game or not, I will enjoy it or not) waaaay better than the old il-2, so do graphics as well , cause as said "aspects of the real world are simulated as good as possible" and aspect of the real world is also the environment. You can't climb up to 5000 meters and the environment to look like you are in 100000 meters high and even behave that way in some short of ... as in il2 did. At the other hand have you ever flown a real Bf 109 or other plane simulated in il2 to be able to judge it's accuracy presented in any sim ? Make up your mind , did I play it , did I played it not , didn;t played it enough ? It doesn;t matter anyway cause you are not in a position to tell what anyone else has played and for how long. Finnaly you did not answer to me do you have a problem with what other people like more or less to play ? or are they not allowed to have their opinion ?
  7. Now that makes sense .In the terms of "aspects of the real world are simulated as good as possible" which I agree, we have to add the environment graphics, atmosphere and physics and to that aspect WarThunder is 1000 times better than the old il2. The rest are very relative to put to the table since control failure depending on damage are simulated more or less on all. So the statement that War Thunder is not a simulation is not valid.
  8. That did not answer my question so here I go again Can you tell me which are the objective criteria that tell what is a simulation and what's not.? Where are they written , who has found them ?
  9. A logical thought sallee, but I tell you from what it seems , it is something different,and it is only the point of some people to force others to accept their opinion or tastes of likeness to a game or to prohibit others' opinion of dislikeness to their "faithful" old product. Reminds me the old rhyme of the Nazis "mein ehre heist treu" have to "defend" their "faith" , no other reason to explain, even worse bashing everyone who hase different taste and opinion stinks as well nazi temperament. P.S> Even more strange is when asked the question if they have a problem with other people having different opinion, they change subject or they do not answer.
  10. My list was more than 2 things which you did not read that's why you want me to tell again.and were not corrected anyway. Have already tested that game 1 month ago at the same time I bought Bos and still the same lame it was. 12 years and remained a junk with just difference more planes and that was it. And yes I agree that old il-2 was a waste of time. Now do you have a problem whith what other people like more or less to play ? or are they not allowed to have their opinion ? , Cause this attitude stinks of Fascist origin
  11. What are the objective criteria that tell what is a simulation and what's not.? Where are they written , who has found them ? I m I getting paid for that test ? Imperfections already mentioned many times. SO where are the data.? First year of course since you want to compare. Now you say other thing , before you commented history as a fact on praising an old game. rather than developing huge difference.
  12. Evolved , so I now what I am talking about, I mentioned this word multiple times, but seems you do not like to read all that I write but refer to portions to proove an opposition. So you don;t know what you really talk about.
  13. That's irrelevant for praising an old simm with lots of imperfections. Games evolve and become better, or else go back and play nothing else than the old sim. The reason you present here is totally irrelevant to the subject. Sure .point is War Thunder has SIX million fans and did not use the "il2 brand" why should they, that il-2 audience is very little. Wrong doubt, judging from the fact that so few people online consisted from il2 worshipers, and total sales of the game does not justify that from the small il-2 audience. That's not an answer, nor does it play any role at all if my opinion is minority or majority, that cannot be prooven anyway and it doesn't matter either way.
  14. See how you contradict yourself ?? Now will you answer me is there a problem with people having different opinions on a subject and want to suppress or prove them wrong for having an opinion ?
×
×
  • Create New...