Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

23 Excellent

About II./JG77_Spaz

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

673 profile views
  1. Finished editing the latest project. Motoadve was kind enough to allow me to be apart of a flight in his CJ6. This is a record of that day, we did some stalls, wing overs, and got pretty close to the mountains. Check it out!
  2. Why the attitude @Gambit21 really unnecessary when the guy is trying to help make the game better and he's giving a real example as he is a pilot himself. You should show a little more respect for someone as a tester. Your a representative of the sim. You of all people should appreciate this matter as he is trying to help. Also, English isn't his first language so he is communicating as he knows how, direct and to the point. Don't assume he's trying to be an ass. Motoadve has all valid points, just wish some of you can listen to constructive criticism isn't of defensive actions.
  3. I was fortunate enough to take part in helping complete my friends annual on his CJ-6 Nanchang. Which is basically a Chinese copy of a Russian Yak-52 trainer. It was quite the experience. Stay tuned! Next video is our first test flight! CJ-6 Nanchang Owner's Website: http://www.backcountry182.com His Youtube Channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEy4on05jWQG3aNN5USqChQ
  4. Looks great. You should stick a $50 price tag on it and start selling! Learn from the best!
  5. A couple weeks ago my good friend and went flying in his Cessna 182 that is heavily modified for flying in the backcountry/bush. We had a blast doing gravel bar landings! Those are always fun! Thought others may enjoy this as well! Gravel Bar Landings! A Backcountry182 Adventure! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMp92E4mV7s Here is his personal website: http://www.backcountry182.com Here is his youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEy4on05jWQG3aNN5USqChQ?view_as=public He's a really awesome guy and an even better pilot.
  6. Unfortunately this has been the general attitude of a lot of the "BoX Old Timers". I will admit most of the people who posted have been fairly pleasant which was a surprise to me to be honest but it was only a matter of time until people started posting childish stuff in response to a legit question and concern. For those who have posted helpful ideas I really appreciate you guys. I will try the tips and tricks suggested. For those who have a consistent childish attitude, your the reason this sim genre stays as small as it does. Its totally unnecessary.
  7. Why wouldn't the development team actually step up and address this? This is what I'm talking about with the team. This is a very simple, valid question that has been a problem with the game for a long time. Thats funny, I'm pretty sure you could go back and see the second post I wrote that clearly said "I understand its only been a day and thats why I haven't heard anything as of yet". People like you are the type that give a bad rap to the game. Stop being so defensive and ready to jump on someone. My god, all I did was ask a few questions about something that has
  8. Guys, Thanks for the civil discussion that has taken place (so far). Thank you for your suggestions and will try said techniques. I still have not seen anything from the developers (The post is only a day old so that is understandable). All I see is mainly tester and founders posting about this issue (some of which is purely conjecture). While I appreciate your attempts, I want to hear from the developers own words. I've been flying simulators since 1993. I'm not new to the scene. Not a single simulator has ever been even remotely close to as bad as this when it comes
  9. Devs, The spotting issue is just really, and I mean really bad. Someone can be half a click in front of you and completely disappear. Can we please get a civil explanation or discussion on this from the developers. Please, someone from the dev team, can this be addressed in some way. What is the problem? Why is it so bad? Is there any chance or hope of it being fixed? Is it even on the priority list? If someone has some sort of solution to this that somehow improves the situation drastically please inform me. I'd love to hear it. I've tried so many things, everything f
  10. Finally, can't wait for a development team who knows what they are doing to make the F4.
  11. A layer of tactical complexity? Seriously? For a basic timer script? With all due respect your giving way too much credit here. I can show you Combat Flight Simulator or Janes WW2 fighters that had much better engine management. When I say this sim is a glorified 1946 I'm not playing. Even 1946 had better aspects. But this game has come a long way. I'll admit that. But most of us have spent in excess of 100+ on this game, I myself closer to 200. And this is the best we get? [Edited] Please keep all insinuations of "Russian bias" off this forum.
  12. Devs, With the amount of DLC and money you have made off of the sim we should be getting something more than a glorified 1946. CEM is the exact same on 1946, in fact I'll argue that 1946 is better in some aspects. CLoD is a small fraction of this game and its got better engine management. I made a post a week ago about 109 engine temps being goofy. If you overheat your engine and eventually blow it due to overheating your temps should reflect that. I actually had some fan boys try to argue that point with me. Truly incredible. Things that need to be fixed 1.) Temp gauges in 109 ne
  • Create New...