Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

135 Excellent

About =621=Samikatz

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

386 profile views
  1. =621=Samikatz

    Wonder if this will be possible with the Me 262?

    For what 1946 lacks in fidelity it massively makes up for it in content, I think even a decade from now people will still be booting it up from time to time On topic: People are already doing 6, 7, 8 kill flyouts against players in the planes we already have, its just a case of stumbling on enough unaware people
  2. A Meteor would be fun if we could also get some V-1 emplacements with some missiles to shoot down, I know we don't have English bases for them to take off from but it'd still be fun! V-1s were operated from the low countries with some attacks directed at ports across the coast, so it's not ahistorical for them to be a target in our map and timeframe
  3. I just want all those sexy rocket rails...
  4. =621=Samikatz

    Too many Bf 109s in the game?

    Seafire, too!
  5. =621=Samikatz

    Developer Diary 215 - Discussion

    I remember reading some analysis that from Normandy to the fall of Germany the US Army encountered something like 3 individual Tiger tanks
  6. =621=Samikatz

    Hype about ME262

    Maybe it's time for server operators to stop bowing down to the whiners and actually click that team balance enforcement option...
  7. =621=Samikatz

    Hype about ME262

    If there was nothing they could do against them there wouldn't be any parachutists to shoot at
  8. =621=Samikatz

    Hype about ME262

    Yeah, I don't understand those delusional people who seem to think it could've come earlier, even in '44 it was still a maintenance heavy problem child and exactly not what the Luftwaffe needed
  9. =621=Samikatz

    Hype about ME262

    262 will do great on dogfight servers where there's no reason not to run away forever. When there are actual objectives to worry about dogfight performance suddenly becomes a lot more important
  10. I wasn't aware it was possible for the U-2VS to be even more fun but here we are. Can't wait to hit fascists with rockets
  11. =621=Samikatz

    1CGS Attending Flight-Sim Expo 2019!

    Planning on making any announcements at the expo? Or just showing off how well the development is going to the unconverted? I don't think that's a fight a Cessna could win
  12. =621=Samikatz

    Developer Diary 214 - Discussion

    I thought "two weeks, be sure" is an IL-2ism originally?
  13. =621=Samikatz

    Developer Diary 214 - Discussion

    Hope we get to see some Allied content soon, we've seen the 262 quite a few times now... Really happy to see how far progress on the Dolphin is! One of my favourite WW1 planes and it should be a lot of fun
  14. =621=Samikatz

    Does IL-2 GB need to return to the Eastern Front?

    It was just a random example. A better example might've been the P-40E? Regardless, every air force did minor iterations of their existing aircraft and it's a problem we're going to have to confront eventually, rather than releasing honestly extremely redundant planes like the G-4 (improved radio systems aren't really a useful feature in a sim where I can't even talk to ATC...). Moving away from the 10 plane Battles format might be the way forward and open up a lot more opportunities
  15. =621=Samikatz

    Does IL-2 GB need to return to the Eastern Front?

    New battles could give access to existing planes and discount the whole thing slightly for people who already own them. A mid-war western front scenario can't really avoid the 109G series, they even carried some of the night fighting slack, so say if you had Battle of Tunisia or Battle of Karelia or whatever, the 109G-2 would appear in that pack too, but Stalingrad owners would get $5 off or something.