Jump to content


Founders [standard]
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

157 Excellent

About III/JG52_Otto_-I-

  • Rank

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

708 profile views
  1. Obviously a good quality plastic material, with a good finishing would be always better (for producer and for the customer), than a bad metal, prone to corrosion, cracks, and other shits. Baur, i think that you know well, or not? 😉
  2. I´m agree that Kg13 is very specific product, for WWII warbirds, because you don´t need more buttons in your stick that you have in the real warbird stick. I suppose that nobody would buy a KG13 replica for playing in StarCitizen or any other space game. ..But contrary to many people thinks, a dozens of different airplanes, Germans and Russian had KG13 grips or a copy of them in the control stick.
  3. I think that, If you are able to build a product with good quality and good price. You will get a best-seller product. As you know, many people like the good relation quality/price. When anybody invest his money in an expensive gadget usually prefer a thing with enough durability. Plastic joystick usually wear and broken in several months of intensive use. A well build Metal thing have a lot of more endurance against wear, than a cheap plastic thing. I´am Aircrafts Maintenance technician, and i may attest that real Airbus Sidesticks don´t have "rubber coating", they only have a proper paint coating. ...By the way the real Airbus paint finishing of the sidesticks, seem lacquered or hard paint. The rubber is bad for cleaning and disinfection, it's better the polish surfaces, because they don't absorb the dirtiness.
  4. I'm interested in buy this KG13 grip replica, for Hotas Warthog, is possible to buy now??
  5. , @E69_geramos109 These are my conclusion after comparing @LizLemon picture, with the real G2 armoured windshield technical drawing. I think that we have the blind angle of upper windshield bar, doubled by the wrong 3D modeling. What do you think?
  6. Esto que hacia el MUSTANG ..¿se llama bailar la polka?? ..y yo que pensaba que era un "cheto" jajaja :-) No nos olvidemos al consabida tendencia al "hachazo" de las alas de flujo laminar del P-51, que tenia al hacer giros cerrados, espero que aquí en el BoX se modele correctamente, y no ocurra como en video del DCS WWII que he puesto ahi, ..que me encontré a ese P-51 que giraba mas que un I-16, jajaja 😄 Os recuerdo que el P-51D a tope de combustible, con el deposito trasero lleno, era un ladrillo, que apenas podía maniobrar, ..a ver que nos hacen aquí. 😉
  7. Our virtual squadron performed some cockpit tours to Spanish Messerschmitt in the Cuatro Vientos Air base Museum in 2014. You can see the diferences in the video taken by III/JG52_Tuckie, in a original Ha-1109-J, (Named also Ha-1112-J1L with weapons installed) a Spanish built version of the Bf-109G2, used in Sidi-Ifni war.
  8. Do you have any video of a real life aerobatic Yak using or opening the landing flaps in any aerobatic maneuver? ... RC model planes are not valid. The use of the landing flaps in aerobatic IRL Yak´s is very dangerous because the aircraft become nose-heavy, and drain a lot of speed. .. and you know it. Several accidents was occurs due to this, the last in 2015. [edited] P.S.: the same is applicable for Spitfire and Fw-190, and rest of the airplanes with powered deployment flaps.
  9. Dear devs: Is there any unknown reason because the "motor-canon" of the K4, don't shoot together with the gunpods canons in the WIP picture? or the K4 is borning with a congenite bug? thanks in advance for reading.
  10. I´m very amazed to read this, .. Do you need fly the Dr-1 with forward stick pressure, at all speeds of flight, fast and slow? .. even at low speed during landing flare? what about the Weight & Balance? Do you need forward stick pressure flying with more weight in the nose?, Hav you try with the real machineguns & ammo., more fuel, a girlfriend in your lap ,etc) ?? But "to shake the guns around the target" is not good for spreading bullets on it? ... I ´ve read about a simple aircraft gunnery practice of doing zig zag, with smooth rudder inputs for sweep the target with bullets. It would be difficult in the real Dr-1?
  11. Yes, ..but 1,98 ATA Is NOT "nice fantasy" for a DB-605
  12. No, ..it´s the real performance in the K4, with C3 (96 octane) 1.98 ATA, 2000hp at 2800 rpm, at sea level. and 1800 hp at 4900 mts. http://kurfurst.org/Engine/DB60x/DB605_datasheets_DC.html
  13. I think that this device named, "endbegrenzungsschalter" ( end limit switch) work like rpm limiter, and as a temporiser, permitting over rev the egine at during one minute. am I right?
  • Create New...