Jump to content

ACG_Smokejumper

Founders [premium]
  • Content Count

    453
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

165 Excellent

About ACG_Smokejumper

  • Rank
    Founder

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

948 profile views
  1. Good post. I think your ideas have merit. Not sure if any of it can be implemented as you also acknowledge but I do like your reasoned post.
  2. What side needs guys? I'm about to register.
  3. Thanks for that. I'll delete my old stuff then. I bombed a bomber out of the air..... Wanted to do something with that. Oh well.
  4. Hi everyone, I remember reading that an update would make old track files unreadable. I've got an old video that I would like to edit. Is there a way to make the track file play? I get an error whenever I try any older videos by using the in game playback feature. Thanks!
  5. 7 years of ACG campaigns with large bomber raids..... We only complained when the latest patch couldn't handle it anymore. ATAG just before the server died had player spawnable air raids with a dozen bombers. We would spawn them in with the intention of playing escort. It was epic fun. I loved the ATAG server. Video with bomber raids, has spoiler due to Haukencruz.
  6. I like the lives and I hate it all at once. I hate it because I suck and lost them pretty quick. My ideas: I would like a way of earning lives back in a way that contributes to the ambiance of the server. Bomber missions for example. Nine successful bombing runs for one life.It should be hard. I think my idea would get more bombers in there air making it more fun for fighters. It's a suggestion made due to having to sit out. I'm having a great time in TAW and would rather fly punishment detail over sitting out. Last ask. Can we please somehow get two characters in the future? I'd love to separate bombers and fighters. It's great! Except I'm dead so not playing. I need to get gud again... 109s are fragile.
  7. No dramas broski. I love a good debate and I never have hard feelings. Come fly with us! Just have to be super careful. I've only got 2 lives left. It's pretty neat how guys run for their lives now.
  8. You ARE projecting. Go back and read it again. The door hit ass comment was not directed at you. How you are proejecting is put a $$$ value using modern constraints on total war. I invite you to re-read not just mine but other posts. You are getting them mixed up. I don't care about the squads feelings who refused to side swap. My comment WAS directed at them and I stand by it. Their selfish nature drove players out. We are returning thanks to admin. Myself and another ACG member are having fun in a 109 for the first time in over 4 campaigns. Most of the die hards quit due to not wanting to play target for team stackers. They drove out from ACG at least 12 guys. We're coming back..... This is thanks to the new balance feature.
  9. Two players have returned with the new balance attempt. We registered BLUE!!! We've not had a chance to guilt free sign up blue for at least 5 campaigns. So far so good. Thanks fellas.
  10. Nope, pure BS. I know myself and quite a few others bailed out. I also know that I'm going to be telling my buddies that TAW might not be a waste of time anymore. Admin also took our fairness gripes seriously enough to piss of quite a few players. Time for the finger treatment!!!
  11. The team stackers are enraged.... 🤣 Looks like I'll be registering for this TAW!!!! It's been a few campaigns. I look forward to signing up. Damn..... I might even register my blue. There where more guys who got sick of the side stack and will return if a fair fight solution has been found. If we lose 8 guys but 15 return..... Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. This rage from the stackers has me looking forward to this campaign. You are projecting modern constraints onto total war in order to fit a poor argument. Very wordy explanations to justify removal of something you don't like. It's not even a large %. I will counter your poor $$$ argument with the 8th Air Force just because I enjoy the banter..... Quantity has a quality all on it's own was the Soviet playbook to drive my point home further.
  12. Why then do WWII aircraft have the ability to fly on instruments? Answer of course is for low visibility due to low light or bad weather. Your focus on one battle is misleading. There where plenty of poor weather flight operations. They are not ideal but they did happen. D-Day for example..... Poor weather. I can also cherry pick WWII era photos with aircraft flying in overcast. Saying it didn't happen is wrong. Saying it happened as little as possible would be accurate. The % poor weather comes up is under %10 from an earlier post. That's not terrible for winter on the Eastern Front. I feel it adds a fun dynamic and when you are in an I16 having somewhere to hide is nice.
  13. Agreed.. It's how you can even the fight a little vs a 109 while flying in an early war aircraft like I16 or P40. I love the bad weather.
×
×
  • Create New...