Jump to content

JG77_Knipser

Founders [premium]
  • Content Count

    148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

355 Excellent

2 Followers

About JG77_Knipser

  • Rank
    Founder

Recent Profile Visitors

1044 profile views
  1. Don't try this at home 😇 (Skins by @JG4_Kruger)
  2. " ... this update will make the online multiplayer experience totally different from how it was before." When i read this line in the patch notes, did not really believe it at first. Spent the whole evening flying online, and i gotta admit, you guys totally nailed it! It's absolutly true, this game is on another level now. Think i only said this once before after a patch, this is a game changer! Thanks for making that happen!!
  3. Thats some great news! The video quality might not be the best, but you already commented on that. Big thanks @Jason_Williams, @Han and the rest of your team, for tackling that problem. We all know how "special" this community is 😅. Keep up the great work you guys did over past years, this sim just keeps getting better and better! 👍
  4. No offense, but it's pretty obvious, why spotting planes in tobruk is so much easier 😂😂
  5. Go for Realism please! .. as far as this is even possible my two cents on this whole discussion: - please fix the LOD issue with dissapearing planes - add some (of course limited) options to adjust the beautiful images, rendered by your game engine. this could be saturation, contrast, gain for example.
  6. I really appreciate the historical research you guys did on the planeset. It's the pilot that matters most, not the plane. Just take a look at the Top5 Fighters, and see what those guys can do with their totally inferiour planes😁 . However, as past discussions in this thread have shown, a big part of the community does not share that opinion and prefers a more balanced planeset over a historical one. Maybe you should also take that into consideration. Since we don't have enough RAF planes available yet, this would be my suggestion for the planeset. It's only the Fighter/Attacker part, since the Bomber/Transport part of the current planeset is totally fine. Again, this is just a suggestion.. nothing more, nothing less😏.
  7. @=LG=Kathon Maybe you should just suspend the ongoing campaign and fix the problems with the airpressure and the durability values of the indestructable targets. Even if it would take you a few days, it's probably worth the wait.
  8. Don't want to get too philosophical, but one of the things that made TAW special, compared to the other 24/7 servers, was it's limited availability for only a certain time frame. Totally enjoyed that deep dive in to this hardcore campaign experience for a few weeks. The long break afterwards was just as important as the actual campaign itself. If i remember correctly there were only two campaigns a year, back when i first took part. That special feeling somehow got lost a little over time. I mean, if something is just there, almost all the time, it's just not special anymore! So @=LG=Kathon, @=L/R=todeskvlt (and all the others of the LG-Squad), if you ask me, you can do a really long break this time!
  9. Type of improvement: Multiplayer Gameplay Explanation of proposal: After joining a Multiplayer-Server, players have to choose a side first, before beeing allowed to see any Map or Briefing details (see attached image).In the current verision of the game, you have to choose a plane first before beeing assigned to a certain team. After that has happened you get a time penalty when switching sides. But the penalty does not apply, if you haven't picked a plane already. So it is a common practice to click on an airfield of the opposing side first, to get some intel about your enemies, like how many players did spawn on a certain airfield or to look for hidden objectives, e.g. Paratrooper dropzones on Tactical Air War. Getting this kind of intel about the opposing team gives you an unfair advantage. Benefits: With little effort, you get a lot more fairplay in multiplayer matches.
  10. 🤩fantastic work! thank you man, hope the devs see that post. one thing is still wrong, the word doesn't make any sense like this and there is also a typo in there. i know, german is complicated 😄 wrong: Gerätebel ausluechtung the correct version would be: Geräte beleuchtung literal translation for that is device lighting, which actually means Lighting for the Instruments (and other Devices) Edit: found a picture from an old bf 109 Manual:
  11. Already posted this in the screenshot section, but since it's TAW related... Yesterday afternoon on the Server: (Skins by JG4_Kruger)
  12. Another Ghostplane video, this time the server wasn't even that crowded. Playback the first Part in Slowmo. I zipped and uploaded the ingame trackfile, download link below(Ghostplane Bug happens at 08:26): https://workupload.com/file/Nt5Vq9tf46S
  13. This afternoon on TAW. (Skins by JG4_Kruger)
×
×
  • Create New...