Spotting. in Complaints Posted Sunday at 01:46 AM 3 minutes ago, SharpeXB said: You know the example you’re citing isn’t from WWII. The aircraft is a T-38 which is 50% longer than a 109. 46’ vs 30’. Depending on the aspect that aircraft presents a significantly larger profile than the fighters in IL-2GB Weird, I hear the sound of finger nails scraping the bottom of a barrel.... Every single ww2 fighter has slightly different proportions. A T-38 is perfectly adequate as an analogue to a general ww2 fighter. Significantly larger my ass. 1 minute ago, SharpeXB said: Why are you in 3rd person? This if anything, only helps the spotting since there is no glass or reflections. So my case is conservative. 2 minutes ago, SharpeXB said: Do you fly arcade style? This is a track 2 minutes ago, SharpeXB said: And this external viewpoint distorts the perceived distance to the target. You completely made this up and it has no basis in fact. 3 minutes ago, SharpeXB said: Am I not supposed to see the obviously visible targets in the second screenshot? They would be easily seen when they’re moving. Like they’re easy to see in your video. Are those supposed to be hard to see? What is this supposed to demonstrate? And this is where you are outright lying or your display setup or eyesight is extraordinary, all 3 of which invalidate your case. I showed this video to about 10 different people before I posted it here and not a single person could see the contacts you are claiming you see. In some cases the pixels are technically visible but the spot is not even remotely practical.