Jump to content

7.GShAP/Silas

Founders [premium]
  • Content Count

    760
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 7.GShAP/Silas

  1. I'm not talking about normal recon. These people didn't suddenly dedicate themselves to stealthily hovering near enemy rear airfields and squinting really hard, they were given radiotelescopes for eyes. This cheat is a disaster for anyone who cares about fair competition and realism. Hopefully it goes away soon.
  2. Yes, I also stopped flying as soon as I saw this cheat and how widespread it is. Suddenly I understood why I saw people on both sides saying things like "4x planes taking off from ~insert rear airfield here~" . If the coming patch really makes the cheat only useable by VR users then I'll fly again.
  3. When you lose your lives, do you no longer get a full '1.0' life back after 20 hours? I lost all my lives and when my timer expired just a little while ago, I never got a whole life back, only .27 life.
  4. Say I organize a rugby match, seven on seven. Except my team is allowed more than seven players because a lot of guys want to join because our uniforms are sweet. And also my team is allowed to tackle yours around the neck because historically my club has done this. Do you think it's reasonable for me to tell everyone they're a bunch of babies and how I don't care about what they think when they tell me that's unsportsmanlike and unfair or even don't want to play at all? Please, give me a break.
  5. Translation: Please, pretty please nobody take my 262 and away! BTW be sure to log in so I can shoot you down, if you don't you're a big pussoise, thanks. Get a grip man, nobody here needs this bizarre lecture, ok?
  6. Why are you such a douchebag? Make an allied account and just see what it's like from the other side. Yeah, huge mystery.
  7. In future bodenplatte TAWs with 262s I'm just going to fly axis. Don't cry Gustav Hagel. Cheer up!
  8. You deserve a medal. I don't understand why ensuring the limited 262s are only flown by cyborgs with years(decades?) of practice is supposed to be appealing to me or anyone else other than those same cyborgs.
  9. No. Yes. I hate that only silly poopsocking ground attack tactics are really functional on TAW, punishing death is only going to make it even worse for the people who are forced to take the largest risks. 90-some percent of sorties on TAW are in fighters(according to stats published some editions ago), you really want that number to go up? What a load of garbage. You do what you're ordered to do or you're ventilated(or disgraced, hated by all and thrown in a hole) . That's reality.
  10. Rather than simply huff and puff about what you specifically didn't want to talk about, I'll address your question: When drop zones were first introduced on TAW, I thought I read that the paratroopers who make it to the ground alive and under deployed canopies are the ones that count. I've been operating off of that memory ever since, and so shoot them as they fall on my way to the Ju-52 if I'm in pursuit and they're on the way. But a concrete statement on it rather than my hazy memory would be much better.
  11. 7.GShAP/Silas + BoBP Admirable generosity, Doctor. Good luck to everyone!
  12. Well, things are looking up for your 'type' so I suppose yes you do! Also, I am on that list, I didn't realise it lists all donations and not just this campaign. it's not under my username.
  13. I don't see your name in the credits, friend. Regardless, you made a statement on what COULD be done, and it was wrong. Marica. Don't know if you'll be able to google translate that one, sadly. Ask around? Not this campaign, no. Didn't you used to taunt the TAW devs about them losing your lunch money? Or do I have you confused with someone else? Anyway, think about the first part of your post and then think about the second part. Then maybe a few more times over the course of a few days, make some flash cards and then maybe, just maybe, it'll come to you.
  14. Of course it can be done, you can hard cap the LW team at 35 players. You might think that's wrong, but it can be done.
  15. The hurricane cannot come too soon. Will help fill a gap in the VVS lineup and get some more people flying red.
  16. Jeez, don't have a hernia. It's my opinion, who's else would it be? What a fatuous thing to say. Serves me right for trying to engage you drones in conversation at all. Here: Enjoy your very special, hard fought big-boy victory. 😄
  17. You don't like the attitude of a lot of the VVS fliers who post here, I get it. But calling a victory with such a strong imbalance in numbers and machines "well deserved" is silly. A hollow victory should bother you just as much as anyone who flies allies.
  18. I would think that Agoy airfield near Tuapse would work, it has a road and railway that lead to it for convoys/trains. But I suppose it must be unsatisfactory in some way.
  19. There cannot be a symmetrical solution to the team balance issue. Axis will always be stacked, at least on the eastern front. Any solutions have to take this into account and not merely reinforce success as they currently do, especially since success comes more easily when you have total technological and numerical superiority. It's not exactly a coincidence that often half the Axis team are majors/colonels and above while half the VVS team are sergeants. I've seen the kid called out multiple times in chat for shooting people in their parachutes. I personally don't care at all, but Ogg previously said that your group does not permit such "behaviour" and that he had gotten a stern talking to. You can't have your moral high ground and eat your cake at the same time. Carry on.
  20. The joke is that with that verbiage you leave little doubt where you're from.
  21. You don't say? Anyway, the balance has gotten much, much worse this map, yes.
  22. Money-worship and delusions of grandeur, that winning combination that makes everyone else hold their nose. It's remarkable that while posting that screed you can call anyone else "unglued" with a straight face. P.S. it's "exorcise", though perhaps you are in need of the other article.
×
×
  • Create New...