Jump to content

HRc_Tumu

Founders [premium]
  • Content Count

    964
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

484 Excellent

1 Follower

About HRc_Tumu

  • Rank
    Founder

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    La tierra.

Recent Profile Visitors

1611 profile views
  1. No doubt , marshall mode can add more coordination and for sure we will have more inmersive feel. But will be different things. I mean , marshall mode perfectly cab be a addon for SEOW... in SEOW you cook all! u place all your forces around map, u decide all your moviments, you plain all the flights.... and when mission is launched u use marshal for control the flight missions. Anyway , lets will see what is posible along future years.
  2. Consistency ... is the right word? i think yes. I miss some consistency in more aspects of game. One is subject of this post, others are about damage of weapons, visual representation of damages and how it affect to aerodinamical caracteristics and DM for some planes are out of the "line".
  3. unafortunally i think we never see SEOW for this new il2
  4. For me is a great addition. Well placed on servers for fast use can be really funny.
  5. about planetset i suggest Il2 1942 for more maps , for many of us is better weapon than il2-1943
  6. Finally i can do more test.. I will try to edit fast a video. On resume. All planes are sensible to wing damages , but are sensible on different levels of damage. My conclusion is il2 is more sensible than others and with less damage of level, lost more sustentation. for me in comparation wiht others, too much sensible. For test i made ONE shot to il2 wings with mk 108 ( is better than 37mm for made big hole ) , after hit 4 il2 , 3 of them crashed after few minuts becouse lost speed and sustentation. For compare with other planes , i use Stuka. Am recreate similar damage on wing... after one hit, all planes still flying , are capable to fly straigh , one of them crash when try change direction.. I imagine, are a relation betwen power/height and suface area/ area damaged. I want mean i don study all cases and i dont have all numbers, what i aprecciate from some patches ago, il2 become more sensible, now from structural point of view is more strong... but in comparation with other panes , are much sensible to damage on wings and easy lost speed.
  7. Basically MP I cant made too many test... Il2 DM is really sensible to damage... and progresive. Wings can take damagre from 1 or 2 minesglosh... automatically plane tends to roll and lost speed but still flying. The "glider" limit point is when takes more damage. For example one 37mm from ground. Or more than 2 mineesglosh. I mean is strange because i cant replicate same in other planes.... if any fighter take similar damge become uncontrolable. lost wint. etc. etc.... but no suffer this glidder effect. Most similar i can explain it is when u lost one of your engines in Pe2 and the other engine starts to fail.... and you need to lost altitude for sustain speed....
  8. Lately... flying il2 i found allways same situation. If my wing was hitted and a big hole apeears on it..... i lost sustentability and il2 pass to be a glider..... no engine power ( it not was damaged) for sustain plane on air... or not wing sustentation for still flying. Any more can aprecciate it?
  9. Every dev diary posting without references to this issue... is more firewood. And comments of some participants are simply from another world. I dont care it im more interested on comments for developers.... Maybe last offerts introduce new players to game and this is great... but in the other hand... many are losing interest in it.
  10. I agree Better visibility... much better for me. Thank you. Next G-effects im sure will be another great tune. I this developer diary i miss some comments about problems with ammo and DM who are presents in game from time ago. Thx for all your work
  11. Ok The main problem is i was sure the base where i ditched was friendly ( over friendly territory ) and not was enemy... thats the reasson for i want know exactly where i ditched...but seems no posible know. Thx for answers.
  12. Salute http://ts3.virtualpilots.fi:8000/en/sortie/552354/?tour=36 in this mission i ditched plane on base , i leave mission alive, but parser says im killed. Maybe i was captured? i was looking for sector i diched plane but i dont find it... is posible this info was removed... i dont know why, but i have the memory, on stats i can found sector where i ditched. im right? is posible know? thx.
  13. 37mm dont work fine.... Expeacialy perforant.... enemy planes are empty and no suffer damage if no hit pilot. DM is totally inconsistend... some times one hit in a wing ( explosive is enought) but many times one hit isnt enought... the best is enemy lost some speed but still been well handable. , considering LW planes are bugged in terms of damage recibed... u easy can need 3-4 shots for kill a bf , foke, macci, etc, etc.
  14. Thats exactly what we are doing... i only propose a bit of fair game for all.... For example , in this map... all Macci and Bf109 are equipped with gunpods and remove head protection. This is forgive equipment and tactics .. no? we can do it for beneficit of someones... we cant do it for fair and balance game. Really all relationated whit historicity is a waste of time. Dont exist and never will exist. If one day we are close to this historicity... game will be close to death , im sure a big part of this small comunity, love too much ther little toys and never will accepted they become defeated. are other ways to balance experience, for made fair the game and provide to both sides, a similar chances for win a map, etc, etc. Not need fly same planes i think.
×
×
  • Create New...