Jump to content

666GIAP_Tumu

Founders [premium]
  • Content Count

    612
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

139 Excellent

About 666GIAP_Tumu

  • Rank
    Founder

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    La tierra.

Recent Profile Visitors

473 profile views
  1. 666GIAP_Tumu

    Tactical Air War

    Yes faucon, if u reached status of CM NA , next aircraft you lose was automatically resupply and CM starts to count.
  2. Well done Talon. This bf109 knows how defend. You had lucky to ride a FN gunnery on La5 for hit on scissors is very hard.
  3. 666GIAP_Tumu

    KNIGHTS OF THE AIR Multiplayer Server

    Good idea explain rules, for some player is needed. Now is more clear. No doubt. About permanently ban of players, i hope really have a solid reason. I want clarify i dont know all details in this case. But not seems a good way to manage a server , i can understand some kind of reaction , but under my point of view, permanent ban need really be last option , i hope admins really consider all options.
  4. 666GIAP_Tumu

    TS hispano parlante

    Es que puede pasar lo que dice geramos... donde no llega el avion, llegan sus proyectiles.. aunque no es facil disparar con el avion medio muerto de tan lejos... tampoco es facil mantener esas ventajas fuera del cono de tiro, pero todo es posible
  5. 666GIAP_Tumu

    TS hispano parlante

    heheheheh de rojo fliparas con las verticales que se pegan los azules y como nunca pierden esa ventaja con la que empezaron.... es decir otra enorme ventaja de volar ambos bandos es tener una idea mas completa del juego y creo que objetiva al final. Lo de la gestion es francamente facil. El unico complicado seria el P40 por el tema de no quemarlo y al final es cuestion de tacto en el Gas y de saber meter el pitch arriba en el momento preciso menos de un minuto y bajarlo en picados . Pero es sencillo, cada avion 3 apuntes que recordar y ya lo tienes.
  6. 666GIAP_Tumu

    Hs 129 | 6 Kills in a flight |

    good aiming is clear this red boys dont know how dangerous can be a Hs129 on good hands
  7. 666GIAP_Tumu

    Developer Diary 200 - Discussion

    im glad to listen netcode improve... I have the feeling , from last patch , my online experience is worst... i always have the same poor internet connexion. But from last patch in some servers practically i cant play fine... This thing move me to believe something was change on model damage or weapons... but after time playing, i think my problem is on internet connection and maybe , better netcode can help people like me, unfortunately we don't have access to better internet connection. THx for DD
  8. 666GIAP_Tumu

    El rincón del video

    madre mía geramos, que festivales te pegas derribandonos
  9. 666GIAP_Tumu

    TS hispano parlante

    Lo que dice Trenkos es cierto, ademas creo que usar pantalla completa no aporta ninguna mejora y no sabia que te daba esos problemas de escritorio, desactiva pantalla completa y deberias poder salir al escritorio y volver al juego. si no, como dices es un rollo apagar juego para entrar en servidor TS. La verdad, yo diria que hasta el 2007 los fae volaron rojo, yo empece en el 2006 y volé con ustedes como aliados en algunas competis. al inicio fae , uso el signo plus para señalar el bando azul http://dangerzone.escuadronbo2.com/pilot.php?hlname=%2BFAE Volar ambos bandos es lo mejor creo yo, al menos para exprimir el juego . Pero a mi me tiran mas los aliados ademas en la mayoría de sitios hacen falta siempre mas rojos que azules.
  10. 666GIAP_Tumu

    TS hispano parlante

    Saludos Azor. Bueno los rojos tampoco es que estemos mucho mejor coordinados, mas bien es que somos pocos, creo yo. y en general bastante veteranos, los nuevos entran en una red antigua y quedan fácilmente conectados. Ahora mismo es cierto que en la medida de los posible por afinidad, por el tiempo y porque coincidimos mucho, HRs, Redeyes, algunosECV ( los que coinciden con nuestro horario) , algunos ala13 al volar de rojo... por defecto caemos en el ts HR o RedEye y facilmente pasamos de ser uno a dos o tres. Si se trata de volar TAW es cierto que ya nos concetramos un mayor número. Pero Azor, te digo como le digo a todos, si tu quieres volar en ts con alguien, entra en el juego, saludas y si conoces a alguien le preguntas, no te cortes, seguro que te pasan sus datos de ts y puedes volar. Yo por ejemplo , he volado en los ts de Ala13, en el discord de PHX, el ts de E69 tambien, o donde haga falta, he volado incluso en ts en ingles y mira que no me entero de casi nada ... es cuestion de ganas, otras veces, por ejemplo, es que me apetece volar solo y ni siquiera estoy en ts e incluos rechazo alguna invitacion. Lo que quiero decir, es que cada uno , siendo educado , practicamente puede volar con todo el mundo si quiere. Ni que decir tiene que si algun dia pasas al lado luminoso y no sabes que hacer con tu preciado mosca, metete en nuestro ts . Un saludo.
  11. 666GIAP_Tumu

    Sell Throttle GVL "Bf 109"

    uuuuao!! im very happy to see this images i
  12. 666GIAP_Tumu

    “Ask Me Anything” con Jason Williams

    gracias no crei que lo leeria, pero me enganche
  13. 666GIAP_Tumu

    Tactical Air War

    Excuse me, i have to rectificate you sir. we dont think thats is OK to do so. If u read and understand all our debate , you can appreciate , we arrives to your conclusion. Maybe can end in a abusing vote ban system, and unrespectful to admins and TAW rules. I made a question to my spanish comunity, many members drop their opinion , arrives to some conclusions and end debate. Thats all, Im proud to can talk with community this questions and apreciate their opinions. i send u a PM Jaffa. .
  14. 666GIAP_Tumu

    Tactical Air War

    Salute all I think author was me , i ask to rest of spanish users about parachute kill for think together what we can do. Our last conclusion was - This tool " ban a pilot with votes " , can will be used in wrong way, and simply ban a pilot for other reasons. And the most important. - TAW have administrators and people are working to made posible, at the end they have the responsibility, for do they want to do , for example about "chutekill" they can lisent the community or no lisent. At the end of the debate conclusions were , if we (like a comunity) go one more step ago than rules, maybe we incurs on a fault of respect to TAW admins In conclusion ( under my point of view ) parachute kill is a TAW admin decision, they promove it, we can do nothing except assume or stop play TAW. But organizate for ban a pilot for "chutekill " maybe can be interpreted like a fault of respect for actualy rules. sry for my bad english
  15. 666GIAP_Tumu

    Tactical Air War

    interesting debate. Many things. About AAA on depots and airfields. I always say is practically innefective. I read here , sometimes fighters destroy it.... totally unnecessary risk ... i cover lot of attacks, and maybe try intercept more ... only few times enemys bomber, slow on level fly ( 4k to 6k ), was damaged. An maybe 5% was shot down... i no care how real is it , many things on TAW are totally unreal if we are honest. The question is, on TAW no have quorum limits... farming is a legal posibility... the real threat for a bombers is be intercepted by enemy fighter... we discurss here ,it is hard to do ... but sometimes with no enemy this threat disapears, will be nice if depots and airfields have some kind of real level of autodefence . Edit for agre i got your point erkki.. if you want bomb one to one, need eliminate AAA . On my patrols i dont see this kind of situation ( fighters attacking AAA and bombers wasting time bombing one to one on depots i mean ) ... but last campaing... red side no have enought resources for defend all objectives ... i imagine blues have the time for elaborate attacks.
×