Jump to content


Founders [premium]
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

823 Excellent


About chiliwili69

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

2744 profile views
  1. OK, thanks. Still low for your CPU. I see you have other GPUs, so you can try to put the 2080Ti or 1080Ti with the 5900X. So, you will how far you can go with the 5900X in the CPU test.
  2. It is a 6800, not the 6800XT. I marked that in color since the GPU seems to be the constraint in the CPU test. Definetely there should be something in the software (either in drivers with IL-2 or somekind of conflict of IL2 with that cards). I will update this info in the "Best PC for IL-2" so people is aware of that.
  3. Thank you for this. This is interesting since the 5900X chips usually deliver around 130fps in this test. So, perhaps the 6800 is limiting this somehow. I will update this to the table, but will mark in color the result just to be aware that could the GPU guilty.
  4. on the B550 boards ASUS seems to be also leading the BIOS update version: ASUS AGESAV2 PI GIGABYTE AGESA V2 D ASRock AGESA v2 D Well, I just went to Gigabyte since it was tested with IL-2 and 5600X and it went well. Then I just went to Gigabyte 3080 since someone in my city was selling it. So, just by coincidence both my Mobo and GPU are Gigabyte. It is running perfectly OK and I gain a lot from my previous PC. However, the B550 Mobos of MSI and ASUS were XMP certified for the 3800MHz Trindent Z Neo, but not Gigabyte: https://www.gskill.com/qvl/165/326/1605159977/F4-3800C14D-32GTZN-Qvl So, next time the MSI or ASUS will be a better bet.
  5. Thank you for testing that. As you said, the limiting factor in the GPU test is the CPU, so this GPU test can not be used to give any usefull data about the potential of this GPU. The CPU % load shown in the afterburner is just and average of the % load of your 4 cores. The heavy thread (which bottleneck the core) of IL-2 is jumping from core to core for windows thermal reasons. So in general there is no useful info to look at CPU % load when playing IL-2.
  6. Index is 1600 vertical. The panels are vertically disposed. So it is 1440x1600.
  7. This is what I was afraid of. It seems a IL-2 problem with the new 6800XT cards.
  8. Well, at least you have some numbers to justify the investment at the home Financial Officer... 😉 Thank you for reporting your test with the new 3080 in VR. You say you don´t use the XMP profile of the RAM. What is the exact model of your RAM? perhaps you could activate an XMP profile which would give you extra fps. Many thanks for this test. It is the second 6800XT in the table and both shows very bad numbers in the GPU Test. But it seems that also affects the CPU Test. Apparently that card works ok with other games, sometimes (25% of cases) above the 3080. So, I think that the problem is with IL-2. Perhaps someone should rise this topic to the IL-2 support/bug thread. 2 cases out of 2. Starts to be suspicious.
  9. Thank yuo Alonzo for your tests. They are well aligned with other Intel CPU at that freqs.
  10. From time to time I was just checking this stock page https://geizhals.eu/, and also sometimes ebay, but the prices were a bit crazy. I was not really in a hurry, I knew I had to upgrade my GPU this year (I passed the Nvidia 2000 series). Then, I just saw a guy (in https://www.milanuncios.com/) from my own city who was selling a brand new 3080 for 999€, with bill bought in Dec-2020 form a known online shop at the same price. I just went to meet him and everything was OK. My other option was to buy a 6800XT or 6900XT from PCcomponentes.
  11. Just a Kuban novorosyk QMB 8vs8 with High Settings, and High shadows, high clouds and 150Km horizon, and FXAAx2 with 130% SS with Index at 80Hz. I am very pleased with the performance of the 3080. Very smooth with clouds and near cities. Now I can really put clouds in my flights without being contrained. There is room for more since temperature is quite good (since no OC, just out of box.). This is fpsVR during no clouds mission low flight over novorosyk. Here the GPU load and other variables with the sme QMB with clouds and no clouds.
  12. We only have one sample of a 6800XT. So, this is not enough. I have read that 6900XT is better than 3080 in DCS, but I really don´t know in IL-2.
  13. I have just got a 3080, replacing my old 1080Ti. The new tests: with new Gigabyte Gaming OC 3080 (out of box ) CPU Test Frames: 6967 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 116.117 - Min: 101 - Max: 163 GPU Test Frames: 8414 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 140.233 - Min: 109 - Max: 170 Frames: 8474 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 141.233 - Min: 113 - Max: 165 Frames: 8459 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 140.983 - Min: 111 - Max: 164 VRTest1 Frames: 4580 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 76.333 - Min: 44 - Max: 91 Frames: 4712 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 78.533 - Min: 47 - Max: 91 Frames: 4647 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 77.450 - Min: 43 - Max: 91 VRTest2 Frames: 4818 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 80.300 - Min: 50 - Max: 91 Frames: 4341 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 72.350 - Min: 44 - Max: 91 Frames: 4458 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 74.300 - Min: 44 - Max: 91 Summary: On CPU Test, same results. As expected. On GPU Test in 4K I went from 95 to 140, so +45fps in 4K! On VRTest1, same results. As expected. Here bottleneck is CPU in both. On VRTest2 with 216%SS (19.5 Million pixels) I went from 45 to 75, so this is +30fps in VR. Probably here I was also a bit bottlenecked also by CPU. The best of all is that the GPU was much more silent than my previous 1080Ti. Specially in the 4K and VRTest2. I will try now how I play with fpsVR with the new card with the Index in QMB 8vs8 in Kuban with clouds. And will see if I increase my usual 130% SS in the Index.
  14. Well, I just got a second hand unused 3080 for a good price. But I was also ready to try the 6900XT, which it seems is better than 3080 in DCS. There is stock: https://www.pccomponentes.com/tarjetas-graficas/amd-radeon-rx-6900
  15. That link explain very well all the repro words used along the time. It could be seen as messy but it is well explained. The current "Legacy Reprojection" option in the per Application Video settings of SteamVR is just the Interleaved Reprojection which was superseded by the cureent Motion Smoothing of SteamVR. Therefore the Legacy Reprojection is something that should be normally off. And in case someone has low fps then the recommended solution is Motion Smoothing. https://www.reddit.com/r/Vive/comments/gnjnlh/legacy_reprojection_mode/ I don´t know why they kept the legacy Reprojection option, perhaps for older apps or who knows. The fact is that running the VRTEst1 of SYN_Vander I get about 77fps avg with Legacy-Repro OFF and 88 with legacy-Repro ON. This is the fps in each moment of the track. In theory, the green line (Legacy Repro ON) should be just 90 or 45, but nothing in between. In theory, the Legacy Repro is switching to 45 after being under 90 for few seconds. But here it doesn´t go to after being several seconds below 90. I also don´t know why the fps are higher when it is swichted ON. I have tried the Legacy repro ON in QMB 8vs8 with 130%SS with no clouds at 80HZ mode (and High settings and almost everything maxed out), and it run OK. Basically because I am always at 80. But if I run the same QMB 8vs8 but with cloudy sky, then the legacy repro enter in action and produce some sttuters which I dont like it. Independently if the Legacy Repro improves (or not) the experience I think that the SYN_vander benchmark should be run with Legacy Repro OFF. Since the Legacy Repro is a kind of rotational motion smoothing, and we want to measure performance just without any kind of ASW or Moting Smootthing. I will update intructions in the OP. @Brandy_ I will not take into account your VR TEsts with the Legacy Repro ON. You can retest them with your 3080 and Legacy Repro OFF. For your normal setting your are of course free to choose legacy ON or OFF. 😉 Many thanks for giving us some light about this high fps you had.
  • Create New...