Jump to content


Founders [premium]
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

135 Excellent


About Banzaii

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

939 profile views
  1. Squadron renamed for Flying Circus, and in preparation for Black September campaign.
  2. Can we add Ragoo to the Entente please
  3. Please add to Entente roster, cheers!
  4. Sure, burnt BBQ, I'll make sure to not make suggestions on the basis of realism next time.
  5. Everyone who complains about the xjammer excuse, has no excuse, kill him, or dont spawn in on the last airfield left. It seems so far like he's playing it alright right now.....lives aernt the problem, its the PE2 spam....VVS must have 2000 pe2s staged on the ftont cuz thats how they rolled map 1. Suggestion, break down airplanes per side down by type. You have 1000 aircraft per map, say 200 are PE2...Once they gone, well theyre gone.
  6. I initially was unsure of 3 lives rule....now im a believer, play like your life matters, it's not hard. Keep it!
  7. Well it hasn't disuaded him from playing taw...his two taw names are bf110 and red110 for each side.
  8. While I agree with the opinion, why buy a game and not fly both sides, forcing players is just as bad or worse...they need to lock people into a side, this whole flippin sides is bush league...bet on a horse and stick to it
  9. Good riddance, [edited] weather diversity
  10. I will re-iterate, if the leaders in the community had backbone and banned him, forcing him to spend some more money to get alt accounts, one he'd either stop, or two, he'd go broke. He's ruined the taw experience for me, and its the best experience in IL-2. BTW he was on my team last taw too.
  11. Gamer: Driving a P-39 to tank column on a PVP server and shooting up the column in a flight sim no less. No care of pilot lives, no care of intent of server. Simmer: More historically focused....might even go a little overboard on simulating pilot life, fear of death etc. Cares about historical accuracy to some degree all the way to militantly. The top group will want the best plane they can to win quickly....the simmer will enjoy the crappy aircraft, learn it, and beat the good aircraft in the crappy one with tactical prowess. That wasn't super eloquent because it should be obvious in this game you have loads of both types of player.
  12. You missed the point completly on my post...people treat this genre in two ways, game and simulation....those attitudes/preference affect how you enjoy your gameplay. Only the others who know me personally will chuckle at the rest of your response, cheers.
  13. I most definitely am not a "gamer" and I want to have the Buffalo and fly it extensively. History and Aviation aficionados would enjoy it thoroughly more than a gamer would. I would say the truth behind your statement is reversed, gamers would like the high end aircraft.
  14. Honestly I think you'll get a IL-2 2.0 engine next to increase the size of maps etc. Then Pacific.
  15. Korea worked in 46' ....it can most definitly work here. You dont need the whole penninsula. Japan to North of Busan....call that the Pusan map.....one seoul to pyonyang....then another up on the yalu river. A mig vs sabre matchup alone eould be popular enough, not to mention the asset sharing across future Pacific expansions. 1C needs to bring the American customer to the table to expand the game...New Guinea is a bad business move, you need a Midway first.
  • Create New...