Jump to content


Founders [premium]
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1966 Excellent

About SCG_Space_Ghost

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

7003 profile views
  1. I think he thinks it wasn't a rhetorical question.
  2. I would not pay an additional $20 for something that should be included with the game and simply, unquestionably needs to be worked on. This isn't DCS. I'm not going to spend $20 on core features, assets or otherwise.
  3. Hey Liz, Hate to be a nag but will we see any of these changes being released as mod packages in the near future? Your work is just too good and I'm itching to try it out.
  4. >be mad that support isn't responding fast enough >get mad on the forums, get borderline belligerent, ask for people to be understanding >complain about how it says DAYS and not WEEKS Holy lack of self-awareness, Batman!
  5. Nah, I know, I know. Had to say something back to the "please understand" portion.
  6. Please understand that your reaction is probably going to leave you with very few people giving you the benefit of doubt. +1
  7. We know. It would be good if you guys assigned a little more priority, resources, finances, whatever it be to improving AI because it is the single, largest point of disappointment in IL-2: GB.
  8. Oh yeah. Military surplus stuff is great - I'd love to see some of what you have.
  9. SCG_Space_Ghost

    [MOD] Icons

    I'm not particularly skilled with things of that nature but I'm looking forward to it. This is already a great start!
  10. SCG_Space_Ghost

    [MOD] Icons

    Very cool. Is it possible to remove virtually all icon data but render a "dot" icon over the aircraft when it gets out to ranges beyond 1.5-2Km?
  11. Why would you waste the publisher's time when they pay somebody to do support for them? Their support "team" is a one man operation. Put yourself in his shoes and imagine the sudden, unexpected workload he had dumped in to his lap because of a content/licensing fault on Steam's end.
  12. Oh knock it off with this tired, old nonsense. Disagreeing with or explicitly not supporting a feature, the implementation thereof, or otherwise is not discrimination. Nobody owes you a novel on why they don't support something and nobody owes you meeting in the middle. Nobody owes you any form of agreement, compromise or otherwise. Discrimination? Really? [edited] is wrong with some of you people? It's a [EDIT] game.
  • Create New...