Jump to content

Kseremak

Members
  • Content Count

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kseremak

  1. First of all I keep my fingers crossed for your fast recovery - you are really a veteran and champion so never give up (like Aleksey Maresyev). 👍 So, maybe I am wrong but if you are from Netherlands - your aiming experiences are from Leopard 2 or CV-90 - both have fire control systems, gun stabilization, hunter killer abilities. It is something different than WW2 tanks. Below is the 2S1 Gvozdika gunner view (on the left PG-2 sight - mostly for indirect fire, and on the right OP-5-37 sight for direct fire - very similar to soviet tanks from WW2): P.S. Imagine this solution - view control with Track IR, tank driving with joystick and gun aiming with hat (or driving with hat and aiming with joystick). It will be possible (and realistic even when using only one hand.
  2. My point is that aiming indicator like in War Thunder which you point at the target and just wait for gun to automatically aim is nonsense (kind of it is possible in Modern MBT's when Commander has hunter killer panoramic sight). And believe me it is possible to miss the target too much left or right if you use only fast electric traverse. That is why I suggested adding button to change from electric to precise manual aim. And yes you are right: mouse is not the best aiming device because it does not have intuitive "zero move point" like button or joystick.
  3. That is 100% true. I am artillerist 😉 2S1 and DANA are self propelled howitzers. My point is that aiming indicator like in War Thunder which you point at the target and Just wait for gun to automatically aim is nonsense (kind of it is possible in Modern MBT's when Commander has hunter killer panoramic sight). And believe me it is possible to miss the target too much left or right if you use only fast electric traverse. That is why I suggested adding button to change from electric to precise manual aim. And Yes you are right: mouse is not the best aiming device because it does not have intuitive "zero move point" like button or joystick.
  4. Of course. There should be an option to use Mouse, button, joystick or gamepad. Of course joystick should be 0-1 when using electric drive (I'm not sure about German hydraulic) and smooth only on manual
  5. Of course. There should be an option to use Mouse, button, joystick or gamepad. Of course joystick should be 0-1 when using electric drive (I'm not sure about German hydraulic) and smooth only on manual
  6. Please don't make World of Tanks from the Tank Crew. The new aiming system is the only possible way to keep realism. I had opportunity to aim and shot 2S1 Gvozdika and DANA. And believe me there is no way to point the target and just wait for gun and turret till they automaticly move like in World of Tanks or War Thunder... Remember good old Panzer Elite? You just have to move the turret left or right on target and than the gun up or down. Of course to be more realistic there should be an option to push the button to change from electric/hydraulic fast aiming to slower but more precise manual one and that's it - full realism will be achieved.
  7. Please don't make World of Tanks from the Tank Crew. The new aiming system is the only possible way to keep realism. I had opportunity to aim and shot 2S1 Gvozdika and DANA. And believe me there is no way to point the target and just wait for gun and turret till they automaticly move like in World of Tanks or War Thunder... Remember good old Panzer Elite? You just have to move the turret left or right on target and than the gun up or down. Of course to be more realistic there should be an option to push the button to change from electric/hydraulic fast aiming to slower but more precise manual one and that's it - full realusm will be achieved.
  8. That is correct answer mate! Congratulations 🎅
  9. Hello everyone! The Il-2 Sturmovik has one of the best player community. When I began my adventure with this game, I was gifted by generous players with the "Battle of Cuban" and the P-40E-1. Now it is my time to be a Santa's elf. OK, talk the talk let's walk the walk. I want to give Yak-1b license key to the first player who will give the exact number of German planes shot down for sure by the Polish 1st Fighter Regiment (or 1 Pułk Lotnictwa Myśliwskiego - 1PLM, which used Yak1b's, Yak-9's and Yak3's). Good luck! P.S. If you already have Yak-1b please do not give the answer 😅 Merry Christmas and a happy new 2019th!
  10. Turret presented above is the cast variant not "formochka". But of course "formochka" also had Mickey Mouse hatches :-)
  11. Hi everyone. Now the developers are still researching the exact variant of T-34/76. In my opinion the best possible variant from the Kursk battle was: Factory 183 with "Formochka" UZTM turret. As you can see on the pictures above the T-34/76 from n183 factory with UZTM Formochka turrets were used at the Kursk battle. Why this variant? The answer is obvious: 1. First of all as you can see on the first picture it was "rich" variant (not very common in the crisis first half of the 1943) - this one probably from 112 factory - stamped wheels instead of cast - look at the wheels - all with rubbers (look at the other T-34's they have cheap wheels without rubbers). It also had armoured MG, 5 gears gearbox and other improvements implemented. 2. Formochka turret from UZTM was 45mm thick (compared to 52mm thickness of cast turret) - but even though it gave better protection because it was stamped from hardened welded armour sheets. (It also has less spalling). 3. It was mass produced (2670 turrets were produced from 1942-1944). 4. It is the prettiest variant
  12. I’m rather new to the community, I jumped here from War Thunder. IL2 is great but I also had only this one concern: WarThunder-like tech chat, I would prefer to have some server without it to have more real experience. This whole tech chat is an argument for many people in WT forum not to jump to IL2 “because IL2 has unrealistic technical chat also, so what the difference” or “so what IL2 has fully working and animated cockpits and instruments if they are of no use anyway because tech chat, so what the difference”. I have no problem playing without tech tips in IL2 (like I didn’t in RoF) and it gives me truly WWII experience, I support an idea of including tech chat in realism options for server admin. Best regards to developers and this unique community
  13. I want to be added, I don't have P-40 yet. Thanks! Btw Yep, you are right RAFCIO13, three of them were unconfirmed. Still, 2 is not "only" :-)
  14. It will be great to feel like noble ace Urbanowicz who shoot down 5 Japs with his mighty P-40. :-)
  15. I would like to participate in BoBP. I also can’t wait for the western front.
  16. I hope developers will find a way to implement it in lower latency MP servers - server owner would decide if the server can cope with them. Thanks for answers.
  17. Would it be hard or resource-heavy to model some basic turbulence when flying through vortices of air generated by another plane? It was an important factor in real world. It would be some random turbulence in some area behind flying plane not to engage PC resources and it would make the experience more real. I.e. Johannes Steinhoff, Luftwaffe fighter ace.
  18. Hi AeroAce and all IL2 community! I'm an active player of War Thunder Sim and an enthusiast of flight sims since being small kid, even before 2001's IL2. I know IL2 serie is far better than War Thunder Sim but because of financial reason i couldn't jump to IL2's community. My brother with nick "Bies" is already in IL2's community. He and his friends from "303 virtual squadron" shown me the new IL2:BoX and they encouraged me to join. I recently bought a joystick and open track and i just created my account to write this post. I allready have BoK because of gift from user Gordon200, so I would like to participate for Battle of Bodenplatte. Personally i think you are doing great job promoting the game and this unique community. Have a wonderfull day☺️
×
×
  • Create New...