Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

34 Excellent

About -RR-Napoleon-

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

410 profile views
  1. Is there any chance that engines can be blown off now? I think that this is a critical part of the damage on all aircraft that has been missing in every flight sim. When you crash land at extreme angles It would be great to show it break off and then the aircraft could explode. But also during flight! I'm sure we have all see the B-26 image, but damages to the engine mountings or even propellers could prove catastrophic during flight as well. Having a prop fly off or an engine mount break would very dramatic.
  2. Wow! Amazing work, really appreciating the level of detail you and your team are putting into this!
  3. This is exactly how I imagine Heavies being implemented. Not only would it help break up missions in SP when you would need to escort a group to Frankfurt or something. But the same goes in MP as they could be a critical objective that could deplete the axis of many tickets. This would give players a reason to fly at the altitudes some of these aircraft were designed to be operating at.
  4. While I agree, I think it would be more disappointing to have another map without a flyable B-25. Also, there is a significant number of B-25 squadrons for the USAAF and RAF
  5. I am a huge fan of the battle of Sicily or Central Med or whatever you want to call it. I have taken the liberty to overlay the Kuban Map over a proposed area. The green bar is an extend few Km to help include more Allied bases. A plane set for this wouldn't need to differ too much from what we already have. Here are extreme examples for both Sicily and Malta campaign with as many DIFFERENT aircraft as possible. The list is incomplete but I'm sure you guys will have some opinions on this! Battle of Sicily Allied: Fighters Options: P-40F Seafire IIC Attackers Options: Beaufighter (type unkown) P-38G Bomber Options: B-25 C/D Collector Options: A-36 Apache Axis: Fighter Options: Bf-109F4 (Trop) Bf-109G2 (Trop) MC.205 Attacker Options: Bf-110G Bomber Options: Ju-88C Torp S.M. 79 Collector Options: Fiat G.55 Battle of Malta: Allied: Fighters: Sea Gladiator Mk.I Hurricane Mk.I Attacker: Bomber: A-30 Baltimore Mk. V Collectors: Spitfire Mk Vc Axis: Fighter: Fiat G.50 Cr.42 Attackers: Ju-87B Bombers: CANT. 1007 Collectors: C.200 (Maps shows Kuban sized map + added (green area) for additional allied bases)
  6. I agree - an L-4 would be a really cool addition to the game. This would be a great addition to a Western Front Tank pack, it would be interesting to give recon aircraft some roles for AI fire missions, as well as updating enemy map markers. Perhaps this is something that could be added with Air Marshall mode. To give the cmdrs current information on enemy movements. An interesting thought about recon aircraft would be to record damage for multiplayer targets. For example a team would not get credit for destroying a target until it is confirmed via recon photos. Obviously this does not suite every mission/server style it would have to be optional.
  7. Ladies and gentlemen, I know there are a million threads out there for adding this or that plane for any number of reasons. I think we all know which bombers we’d love to see playable in game, but this is NOT a thread about that. The Meat: I understand the Devs have touched on this before, but with the Battle of Normandy and the Arado, Ju88C6, and Mosquito coming out soon, I wanted to bring this up again. The Western Allies really need a new playable Medium Bomber! The path of least resistance seems to be variants of the current A-20. They were used heavily during the Normandy campaign. The current Lend-Lease version is a little impotent with its bomb load and defensive gunnery. I understand that nearly every other allied plane is a highly capable attacker but it would be amazing if we could use some Western Allied A-20s as flyable stop-gaps until we can get our dream planes (cough cough B-25/B-26) I am fully aware of the difference between the Lendless A-20s and the ones used by RAF and AAFs but I feel like it would not be as much of a colossal task to modify the existing aircraft than building out brand new bombers. I would even be willing to pay bomber price for a combo pack of both RAF and USAAF verizon, that doesn’t seem too reasonable does it? The Bombardier: So I know there have been a few threads and posts about this scattered around but I thought I’d add my 2 cents to this as well. It would be a huge improvement to functionality and immersion to have a navigator/bombardier nose position available in single AND multiplayer. Being able to look out the nose and navigate accurately to help guide the pilot to a target would improve the multi-crewing experience immensely. Dreams: (B-25 and friends not withstanding here) To add onto the bombardier navigator position, giving the navigator some map tools in a “bomb site” style map view would be really cool! That way they can call time to target, rate of fuel loss, wind drift etc. This would elevate the whole bomber crew experience. Co-pilot/multiseat aircraft (Ju-52 and U-2) it would be really very cool if it was possible to pass control over to the other seat and take it back as PinC but also if the pilot were to be killed, control would pass automatically to the second seat. This would create a very immersive co-op/multiplayer experience. This feature would also be handy for teaching new players to fly and get used to the controls and feel of an aircraft. (I would love to see a trainers plane pack in the future)
  8. Any chance that engines breaking off mounts will be added?? and even a crushed version for planes with glass nosez?
  9. Wow this new DM sounds AMAZING! It has been a very long time I have been this excited for an update!! But I have a question, will the tires be a separate component to be damaged - so when landing with flat tires or even too hard landings causing tires to blow up?
  10. They don't exist in the A-20C so I see no reason they would add it to the Mossie.
  11. I have only used Photoshop, so unfortunately I am not sure what tools are what and how they work. I wish I could offer more assistance. You don't have to commit to anything, I too would like to do some P-51 and P-38 skins. But, to be more direct, if a pack were to be made, could I use your skins in it with proper credit.
  12. Sooo, Im totally loving this despite all my wishes for other battles I'm about to preorder. this is a great choice with great planes. Buuuuuut I'm only 95% excited because I think a plane is missing. The A-20G, the allies could really use a flyable medium strike aircraft that can be multi crewed.
  13. Are you using Gimp or PS? P.S. I made "Ole Cock III" and am working on a Pengie IV skin... it's been kinda back burnered but I'd like to finish it up. Perhaps make a Fighter Group Pack as I know some folks have made some of the other skins.
  14. U can't use any black/gray that is darker than like 90% or else the alpha will see it as a pure black and make it see-through. Easy fix is to use a levels and lighten your blacks a bit globally until they stop being see-through.
  15. Any update on this project? I was about to dive into this and thought I should google a little first - why re-invent the wheel. 😆
  • Create New...