Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 69th_Ustio

  1. https://playcaliber.com/en/ Topic. this is the game and 1C publish it
  2. it would be a great. once it get stuck you pretty much can do anything. you can't even move your mouse.
  3. i think the flare gun is a little bit OP no ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9N_JLzmOF0c&feature=youtu.be
  4. sorry if this has been ask. But is the sound change intentional? I can hear people approaching my low six.
  5. Great job guys. With everyone flying the PO-2 after the new pilot model change, I can finally have a chance to get an Ace in a flight xD
  6. yeah. instant buy for me if its a collector plane
  7. hello Dev. i think the gun bug is back? i was on CB lining my shots. when i press the trigger nothing
  8. buy it here so that all the money goes to the developer. then if you can, link your account to steam. its just better in terms of downloading updates than the stand alone clients in my experience
  9. can't wait. although i kinda hope that one day IL2 will simulate bending, crumpling, deformities damage. sort of like BeamNG damage but not to exaggerated
  10. With all the collector plane available, any chance of a bundle release for collector plane? thanks
  11. Also back in the days, damaged engine used to emit black smoke if it still running. now it only smoke when it's about to quit.
  12. Type of improvement: Interface Explanation of proposals: add the ability to preselect the gunsight gyro setting on the hangar loadout Benefits: so that we don't have to set it on the plane. and it will be preselected everytime you load an aircraft with a gyro sight something like this
  13. is the trim value bugged or intended? i'ts showing negative value on the right hand side. and its giving me pitch up
  14. can't wait for the tempest. mainly because those 4 Hispanos will compensate my terrible aim 😂
  15. Regarding the texture. shouldn't the color of the leading edge for the RAAF Spix IX be white instead of yellow ?
  16. I actually i dont mind if its' thinner as long as its longer. It used to be so gorgeous back then when the sky fills with smoke.
  17. no not the smoke when you have a rich mixture or full power. but the smoke when the engine got damaged, for example back then if you damage your engine on HE111 by putting the throttle on climb or take off power for too long it will start to get damage and emit black smoke. Now it doesn't do that anymore, you only emit black smoke when the engine is about to quit(when your aircraft starts vibrating and when your RPM starts to fluctuate). but yeah i remember reading a DD a while ago where they manage to improve the water(or something else) quality without losing too much performance
  18. couple of patches ago they change the smoke effect. back then smoke and vapor trail used to be longer and thicker, now it's shorter and thinners which makes it less immersive. Also, your engine is no longer smoking if it gets damaged. so I wish we have the ability to make the smoke effect like before.
  19. I can tell you in my country it's not declining but rather booming, but its the civilian simulation that is booming not combat sim and here's why 1.it's an easier sim. let's face it, with 30 minutes of youtube video tutorial you can learn how to start a 777,737 from Cold and Dark, load the FMC and fly LNAV VNAV and let the autopilot take you there, basically you are playing computer inside of a computer. No need to learn some basic BFM. 2.to be able to have a good experience playing combat sim you need to invest on a lot of hardware such as good HOTAS and at least track
  20. im just curious. doesn't losing both of your Horstab especially the 109, would cause the plane to instantly nose up instead of down? the reason for this is because you most likely always put the stabilizer position in a nose heavy position right? so that means the horstab(which is an all flying tail for the 109) will have a negative angle of incidence which creates a big downward moments to counter the nose up tendency, so that you have a level flight. wouldn't losing all of that moment from losing the horstab will cause the plane to go up instead of down? the only way i can think of is that t
  21. @77.CountZero you're right, we already have some of planes that saw action in Norway. the only way they can add some new Axis planes if they expand the timeline and go beyond 1945. For example, we can have the: -Me 410, I believe ZG 26 use it, but they use it in September 44, and I'm not sure if they took part in operation Tungsten or Goodwood -BF109T, well this might be an extreme example, and I'm not sure if they were still in service during this timeline, but I read somewhere that a BF109T manage to score a B-17(i forgot which source), -BF109 G-10, there were some G-10 th
  22. @Vig but im still 50-50 about 1943 med and Norway. because if they release it with wildcats and dauntless it means that they have lost 2 plane for the possible Pacific pack(if its Midway that is) i only see they take this route if the pacific is no longer an option but they still want to make carrier operation. that why i prefer Norway 1944, the plane set doesn't interfere with the potential Midway planeset
  23. @Vig im down with the Med. but that planeset will be limited though, since the corsair didn't saw action until 44. i just forgot that the avenger took part in the later operation on the Tirpitz(operation goodwood) so yeah it would be a win-win if they make Med or Norway campaign IMO
  • Create New...