Thank you! great idea! Just a few days ago Han posted this on the question for developers thread:
As I've said many times before, rule is: in my PM box should be a message where will be:
1. Claim detailed decription, which explain all aspects of the claim
2. Supporting historical technical sources like flight manuals, flight test reports and so on, with strict pointing page and line where we should look for proofs
3. Strict flight tests in game, which shows significant difference between game and historical source.
If it is - we start to investigate the claim. Two finals are possible:
1. We provide "our FM is ok" proofs
2. We fix the issue
I'm hope it's clear. And, actualy, it works.
I share the feelings of many that there is something to fix with the way the FW behaves, but for me is just a feeling, I don´t know anything about aerodinamics and have no proof. And i´m open to be proven wrong.
But there are ppl that seams to know what they talk about but the way they conduct themselves makes me question their intentions and partiality. In the other thread I asked them to share their reports and responses from the Devs but noone will do, so either they didn´t report anything, or they got a response they are not willing to make public.
If we could make a report put together by the communitty it will be great!