Jump to content

Saburo

Members
  • Content Count

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

About Saburo

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

132 profile views
  1. In ETO, after WWII (so never). In PTO and C.B.I. around May/June 1945. Speaking about using HVARs, but planes with capability carry them appeared during early spring 45 (these planes were from late D-20, no D-15!).
  2. The P-51D-15 has been mentioned several times here as a incoming P-51D block. I read that USN/MARINES pilots in case of Corsairs weapons preferred the greater ammunition capacity of the machine guns. Finaly nearly 50 F4U-1C were upgraded to F4U-1D with 0.5cal MGs... They admitted cannons bigger effectiveness especially against ground targets, but still more ammo was more ammo. Do not forget that US pilots did not fight against 4-engines bomber armada or against extremely armoured Il-2s. 0.5 cal MGs were enough against fighters and 2-engines bombers and as a bonus allowed longer time of fire than cannons equiped planes. About "noticable peformance differences between the blocks", i do not think so. The certain difference was between D-5 and rest of D models because of missing dorsal fin fillet. And may be between Mustangs operating from IwoJima and rest beacause of battery movement forward. At least one pilot from 7th AF commented that Mustang after this was slightly manoeuvrable. The biggest impact on plane performance was due to fuel, not plane block.
  3. On C.B.I. map, yes. With only European maps, hardly...
  4. From the second World side, Yasuhiko Kuroe, Japanese ace who tested captured P-51C: ..."The absence of oil leaks was surprising to most, as..."...
  5. if Wing Czech, then 134.Czech Wing with 310, 312 and 313Sq
  6. Only T-bols used in C-B-I, like P-40 or P-51, were equiped with DF.
  7. P-47, A-8 and more, definitely time to return to Il-2... great news, can't wait
×
×
  • Create New...