Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SCG_Sinerox

  1. I would just say the 109s roll rate is okay, not poor. It can still handle a rolling scissors fight perfectly well and maneuver with them, at high speeds they definitely get slow but the application of high speed roll rate is pretty rare
  2. 109 without a doubt. Has greater strengths against the P51 then the dora has
  3. Hey devs, would you mind enplaning what the red arrow is on the fuel gauge of the 109. I have no idea what it is and haven't heard about it before, thanks!
  4. Totally forgot about my streak and just screwed around with the camel lol
  5. Congratulations Reds! You fought really well and that team work as always was amazing to go up against!
  6. Hey Devs, can you change the German word for... German to Deutsch on the TAW Website. The other languages are listed in their own language except for German.
  7. Looks like server is already dead on first day 😥
  8. I can't fly anything but spitfires on allied side and I'm not really interested in any of the other planes. I also hate wing mounted guns and can't hit a barn at 50 meters with them. Sadly most allied aircraft use them, just to add fuel to the fire the americans only use .50 cals instead of cannons which I'm used to. All in all me and western allied planes don't get along except for spitty. Furthermore I'm not really flying this taw and after years flying cb western front crap I'm tired of the west and rather spend time on finnish with my f4 and yaks on the eastern front.
  9. The planeset on the website seems very strange. Is it accurate?
  10. Ok, so a bit to unpack here. G6 late with mw50,erla haube, and larger tail was produced... I don't think I ever refuted that. I did say " It was a fairly simple modification (the erla haube, and mw50 that is) as it was done in the field to already existing G6's." This is true as to the 109 G6. Erla haube is as difficult as replacing the canopy, and the mw50 would require the AM version of the DB 605 instead of the DB 605 A which the regular G6 used. Then you would need to install a MW-50 tank and connect it up to the supercharger intake as it would spray mw50 into the intake. Pretty easy syst
  11. The majority of G6 Lates did not have the taller tail unit (Depended each factory, as each factory had differences. Erla made a slightly different 109 to Regensburg, suppose it could be a mod I guess). It was a fairly simple modification (the erla haube, and mw50 that is) as it was done in the field to already existing G6's. They didn't have to produce an entirely different G6... if that was the case it the late G6 would've had a new variant name. How do earlier 1944 allied aircraft have better performance then late 1944 ones? Especially once 150 oct comes in. It's not like the 1941-4
  12. Are we seriously frowning at me for pointing out the game is selling a modification for the 109 that is already in the game? My bad for pointing totally legitimate complaints and ruining your BoN experience. I see you were enjoying gushing about the latest expansion.
  13. That way Lukey you could still get BoN and the G6 "late". In place of the 109 in the base package of BoN they could add... anyone know? oh yea... a g6as Your probably right, but there are much smaller things internet forums have been fought over about then complaining about a product being sold which is already in the game at the expense of the consumer.
  14. Problem lies in how they've done this. Had they released G6 alone with Normandy it would'nt be a problem. But now we're stuck with either making the G6 a prem plane (which it already is, but for BON which is a bit weird) or making it a base plane that your expected to pay for basically an mw50 mod and erla haube. Also who says I'm against adding a 109? Ask anyone who knows me and they will tell you I love the 109 and honestly I'd like every 109 produced in numbers in the game. But your basically paying for a mod for a plane we already have. Instead they could've added a 109 G6 with AS? That wo
  15. Super excited for the G6 late. Its like nothing else in the game and we really need it. I mean, its not like they could've made it a mod for the 109 g6 in game already... instead I get to essentially spend 10 dollers on a plane pretty much already in the game. I'm SUPER excited!!! Maybe next they'll give us 109 G-6/U4 as a premium plane for 20$ too!
  16. +1 for native proper zoom for VR users. Even as a monitor user I can appreciate your struggle right now.
  17. Exactly, We actually want opposition so we don't roll the map over.
  18. That would be assuming all other variables are the same. The American playerbase is roughly half the number of European players. You can see this for yourself by looking at the total number of players on multiplayer at eu prime time and na prime time. Or just goto steam charts to get a idea of the steam communitity(which I realise isn't the entire community but it gives a rough idea). The point in all of this? Well since the EU playerbase has many more people then the NA it has a larger buffer of people that can be turned off before TAW starts feeling negative effects. Because the NA populatio
  19. Your right. BUT if you would take two seconds to read our concerns... we are worried about the fact that TAW during American time zones is much less popular then CB and WOL, thats the only thing we are comparing... just numbers. We then correlate that to some of the rules in place and how that is driving down numbers. Heres the thing Chimango... what good are all the rules... if no one flies the server?? EU TAW has seen lower numbers in the past then ever before. Their are many many variables involved, and you pointed out one of them, I'm sure some of the people not flying due to
  20. Gonna clarify something for ya Chimango. Good old Wulfe here? He's Canadian, so back off with the American insults to him please. Feel free to throw them at me through even through I'm probably the least likely American to find flying in an American plane if you catch my drift. Also it would seem we both agree that the regulations or atleast the idea of them are good. They kept TAW competitive and sought to keep quality gameplay to TAW where other servers have lost it. I don't think anyone here really wants to see all of the rules gone, and you yourself pointed that some loosening of the rules
  • Create New...