Jump to content

Ala13_ManOWar

Members
  • Content Count

    50
  • Joined

Community Reputation

11 Good

About Ala13_ManOWar

  • Rank
    Member

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.ala13.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

617 profile views
  1. Ala13_ManOWar + BoN Thanks for the initiative man . S!
  2. :lol: :lol: Bueno, seguimos sin cambiar de bando por la campa√Īa que esper√°bamos volar con vosotros, a partir de Septiembre a ver si retomamos la idea, pero ya sabes que no somos exclusivos . S!
  3. Pues est√° complicado volar la campa√Īa. Esta noche estamos intentando entrar y despu√©s de muchos intentos lo hemos conseguido, pero ha costado al menos media hora. Supongo que es tema de misi√≥n muy cargada, mucha gente dentro del servidor e intentando entrar a la vez, y cosas por el estilo, pero si esto es as√≠ habitualmente desde luego no es nada pr√°ctica la campa√Īa. Es una pena, pero si en una noche consigues volar una salida con suerte despu√©s de media hora, o m√°s, intentando entrar, ech√°ndote el servidor una y otra vez, cuando consigues entrar no te deja espawnear, a veces se queda bloqueado
  4. Pues qué bien. Bueno a ver si la próxima . S!
  5. ¬ŅC√≥mo os est√° yendo el √ļltimo parche? Parece que ha mejorado la fluidez bastante, aunque personalmente a√ļn no lo he probado a fondo. S!
  6. Of course you did, that's fine. But coming to say Lagg-3 works flawlessly after doing what others found before to work isn't "doing nothing at all" . I usually have no problems landing or taxiing but I have a bunch squadmates some newbies and some coming from old simulators and they do have problems, should I say everything is perfect and nothing happens at all because I can do it myself? That's my point. S!
  7. Yeah mate, nice landing. Funny enough you had no problem doing exactly what you have been told a hundred times before, you even look for 20% power after touch down what isn't need at all in 109 to land properly. Yeah, first time, and yeah you "did nothing" to land perfectly and make a video "showing your mastery" . S!
  8. Well yes, technically you should be able but IRL not all the countryside is suitable and not all the aeroplanes are prepared to do so. Also remember about that "all directions" they used circular airfields to be able to do so, here in BoS we only have runway airfields available. S!
  9. If that's the reason they didn't achieve it, I can take off easily out of the field. S!
  10. Is it untrue? Was it their goal ever? Is it any bad? Whatever, I can enjoy any sim I want the way I want like everybody here. Can't I? S!
  11. Of course mate, your opinion is fine . I don't try to "know" what's on devs head, but they are clearly aiming different things, isn't it? Il-2 never intended the hardcore flight simulation at all, they didn't even tried to go for the clickable cockpit and full systems resemble, that's right? So they have different goals in mind, and it's fine there are different options out there. I don't agree with you in the "better scenery", well if you mean about map theatre yes, definitely BoS and BoM have their adequate and logical maps, but if you mean how they look IMO right now DCS engine looks way b
  12. Nice story by the way . I think you mean C-47? Old argument, yes they were in a Spit in 20 hours, but no, Spit wasn't their first ride, they learnt to fly in some others aircraft and that wasn't just 20 hours. They already knew how to fly when they reached Spit, it was just too soon to go into combat with it. IRL a tail dragger is tough to handle and that's plain truth, just BoS behaviour IMO is weird and doesn't match that tough RL, BoS is tough in a different way and that's weird. But still BoS can be easily mastered IMO. They are incomparable at all, one a thorough study
  13. You can give a try, DCSW base is free and you get a TF-51 . Anyway I don't fully agree, you know DCS comes from LOMAC and they were and still are quite focussed in combat, just jet combat until few time ago, and now they are able to enhance the realism with current PCs they are doing so also going into prop combat (and we agree still lacks some points but they are on it). People seems to forget we asked for that realism all the time since old Il-2, of course with Oleg ignoring us , but that was the reason behind CloD try (and they failed miserably ). Yes, Targetware was quite nice, it's r
  14. You mean torque as DCS is modelled, right? I see many people there despite torque . Funny thing is people there usually talks about how rewarding is learn to master and tame those beasts, with only a few complains. Here I see the complains but I don't see people talking about how rewarding is to tame the sim. May be users age range? Dunno. RL experience here. No, in my own experience BoS ground handling isn't real at all. Have you tried DCS? That's real world, and also no, it's real but IMHO it isn't harder to taxi than BoS at all (may be knowing the real thing helps, Ok, but). Anyway also
×
×
  • Create New...